Impact of Fluid Balance on Extubation Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Extubation readiness in the ICU involves assessing multiple physiological and clinical factors. Recent research has shown the role of fluid balance in successful weaning from mechanical ventilation, with a positive fluid balance associated with extubation failure.(1,3) This retrospective analysis examined the impact of fluid balance on extubation outcomes in critically ill patients. This study aimed to quantify this relationship and identify the potential threshold values for fluid balance that could predict extubation outcomes. These findings could guide fluid management strategies before extubation and improve the weaning success rates. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between fluid balance and extubation success in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to a 20-bed ICU who underwent mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours between January 2020 and December 2022. Data on daily fluid input and output were retrieved from electronic health records. The primary outcome was extubation success, defined as remaining free from mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours post-extubation.(2) Patients were categorised based on fluid balance in the 24 hours before extubation: negative (<0 mL) or positive (≥0 mL). Logistic regression was performed to examine the relationship between fluid balance and extubation success, adjusting for age, severity of illness scores, and comorbidities. RESULTS: 245 patients (mean age 62 ± 14 years; 59% male) were included. Of these, 150 (61%) achieved successful extubation. Patients in the successful extubation group had a median fluid balance of -500 mL (IQR -800 to -200), whereas those who failed extubation had a median fluid balance of +250 mL (IQR -100 to +600). A negative fluid balance before extubation was significantly associated with higher odds of success (OR 2.35; 95% CI: 1.30–4.25; p=0.003) after adjusting for severity of illness and comorbidities. Additionally, patients with negative fluid balance demonstrated a shorter ICU length of stay (median 9 days vs. 13 days, p=0.01) and fewer ventilator-associated complications.(4,6) CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that maintaining a negative fluid balance before extubation may improve extubation success in critically ill patients. Strategies aimed at optimising fluid management should be considered in extubation protocols to enhance patient outcomes.(5)

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jaypee-journals-10071-24933.159
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Fluid Balance on Extubation Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

Abhilash Dash, Shakti Bedanta Mishra, Satyajit Choudhury
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Impact of Fluid Balance on Extubation Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

Abhilash Dash, Shakti Bedanta Mishra, Satyajit Choudhury
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Extubation readiness in the ICU involves assessing multiple physiological and clinical factors. Recent research has shown the role of fluid balance in successful weaning from mechanical ventilation, with a positive fluid balance associated with extubation failure.(1,3) This retrospective analysis examined the impact of fluid balance on extubation outcomes in critically ill patients. This study aimed to quantify this relationship and identify the potential threshold values for fluid balance that could predict extubation outcomes. These findings could guide fluid management strategies before extubation and improve the weaning success rates. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between fluid balance and extubation success in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to a 20-bed ICU who underwent mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours between January 2020 and December 2022. Data on daily fluid input and output were retrieved from electronic health records. The primary outcome was extubation success, defined as remaining free from mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours post-extubation.(2) Patients were categorised based on fluid balance in the 24 hours before extubation: negative (<0 mL) or positive (≥0 mL). Logistic regression was performed to examine the relationship between fluid balance and extubation success, adjusting for age, severity of illness scores, and comorbidities. RESULTS: 245 patients (mean age 62 ± 14 years; 59% male) were included. Of these, 150 (61%) achieved successful extubation. Patients in the successful extubation group had a median fluid balance of -500 mL (IQR -800 to -200), whereas those who failed extubation had a median fluid balance of +250 mL (IQR -100 to +600). A negative fluid balance before extubation was significantly associated with higher odds of success (OR 2.35; 95% CI: 1.30–4.25; p=0.003) after adjusting for severity of illness and comorbidities. Additionally, patients with negative fluid balance demonstrated a shorter ICU length of stay (median 9 days vs. 13 days, p=0.01) and fewer ventilator-associated complications.(4,6) CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that maintaining a negative fluid balance before extubation may improve extubation success in critically ill patients. Strategies aimed at optimising fluid management should be considered in extubation protocols to enhance patient outcomes.(5)

Indian Journal of Critical Care MedicineVol. 29(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.