Redefining design features for mitigating performance gaps in higher education buildings

Purpose Higher education (HE) buildings should function as versatile spaces that meet the requirements of diverse end-users. However, research indicates that HE buildings often fall short in addressing these needs, resulting in performance gaps that negatively affect end-users’ well-being and productivity. A primary reason is the inadequate consideration of diverse end-user needs during design. This study aims to establish comprehensive design features that bridge these gaps, ensuring HE buildings effectively meet diverse user needs while incorporating designers’ perspectives. Design/methodology/approach A two-stage qualitative approach, consisting of a systematic literature review (SLR) and focus groups, was adopted. The SLR identified design elements and features for HE buildings from 38 journal articles and seven design guidelines. The design elements were refined through insights gathered from four focus groups: three end-user groups – students, academics and professional staff – along with designers. Findings The study establishes new design features to enhance the performance of HE buildings, contributing valuable insights to the existing body of knowledge on briefing and user-engaged design. It introduces 84 design features, organised into 13 design elements: spatial configuration, aesthetics, connection with nature, inclusivity and accessibility, sustainable design, lighting, thermal comfort, indoor air quality, privacy, ergonomics, operational services, learning, teaching and research enablers and safety and compliance. These design features enable designers to develop a comprehensive project brief, thereby creating a user-centred designs. Originality/value The findings equip HE institutions to procure cost-effective, adaptable and high-quality spaces that enhance educational excellence and end-user satisfaction. It can help mitigate the recurring problem of performance gaps in HE buildings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-02-2025-0059
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining design features for mitigating performance gaps in higher education buildings

Fathima Sabrina Nazeer, Abid Hasan, Imriyas Kamardeen
2 citations
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
17.85
article

Redefining design features for mitigating performance gaps in higher education buildings

Fathima Sabrina Nazeer, Abid Hasan, Imriyas Kamardeen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose Higher education (HE) buildings should function as versatile spaces that meet the requirements of diverse end-users. However, research indicates that HE buildings often fall short in addressing these needs, resulting in performance gaps that negatively affect end-users’ well-being and productivity. A primary reason is the inadequate consideration of diverse end-user needs during design. This study aims to establish comprehensive design features that bridge these gaps, ensuring HE buildings effectively meet diverse user needs while incorporating designers’ perspectives. Design/methodology/approach A two-stage qualitative approach, consisting of a systematic literature review (SLR) and focus groups, was adopted. The SLR identified design elements and features for HE buildings from 38 journal articles and seven design guidelines. The design elements were refined through insights gathered from four focus groups: three end-user groups – students, academics and professional staff – along with designers. Findings The study establishes new design features to enhance the performance of HE buildings, contributing valuable insights to the existing body of knowledge on briefing and user-engaged design. It introduces 84 design features, organised into 13 design elements: spatial configuration, aesthetics, connection with nature, inclusivity and accessibility, sustainable design, lighting, thermal comfort, indoor air quality, privacy, ergonomics, operational services, learning, teaching and research enablers and safety and compliance. These design features enable designers to develop a comprehensive project brief, thereby creating a user-centred designs. Originality/value The findings equip HE institutions to procure cost-effective, adaptable and high-quality spaces that enhance educational excellence and end-user satisfaction. It can help mitigate the recurring problem of performance gaps in HE buildings.

Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Redefining design features for mitigating performance gaps in higher education buildings — Fathima Sabrina Nazeer, Abid Hasan, et al. · Smart and Sustainable Built Environment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS