Clinical Utility of Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Patients Presenting with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed to the Emergency Department in A Tertiary Care Centre in South India

INTRODUCTION: The Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GB Score) is a validated screening tool used to predict the need for therapeutic interventions, such as blood transfusion and early endoscopy, in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). However, there is limited research regarding the optimal GB Score cut-off values for predicting these interventions in the Indian population. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to Compare GB score with the need for Blood Transfusion and to determine the cut-off GB scores that predict the need for blood transfusion and early endoscopy in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective comparative study done among 100 patients who presented to the ED with Upper GI bleed. Mean GB Score was compared among patients that required blood transfusion (50) and those that did not (50) and association of GB Score and need of blood transfusion and early endoscopy was found and a cut off score was calculated using ROC curve.(1,2) RESULTS: The mean GB Score was significantly higher in patients who received blood transfusions compared to those who did not (p<0.001), with a large effect size of 0.93. There was a statistically significant association between GB Score and blood transfusion (p=0.006), with an effect size of 0.27. The ROC curve for blood transfusion had an AUC of 67.8%, and the cut-off GB Score for predicting the need for transfusion was found to be 8 (p=0.002) with a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 46%. A significant association was found between GB Score and early endoscopy (p=0.001), with an effect size of 0.32. The cut-off GB Score for predicting the need for early endoscopy was found to be 9 (p=0.001) with 80.6% sensitivity and 54% specificity. DISCUSSIONS/CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a GB Score cut-off score of 8 for blood transfusion and 9 for early endoscopy can effectively predict the need for these interventions in patients with UGIB in the Indian population. Referring patients to a center with blood bank and endoscopy facilities is made easier by calculating the GB score in peripheral centers. Early intervention based on these scores may be associated with better clinical outcomes, including reduced need for invasive ventilation and lower in-hospital mortality. Larger RCTs are needed to confirm the results.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jaypee-journals-10071-24933.186
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Utility of Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Patients Presenting with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed to the Emergency Department in A Tertiary Care Centre in South India

Manna Maria Theresa, Bharath Prasad S, T P Sreekrishnan, Gireesh Kumar et al.
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Clinical Utility of Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Patients Presenting with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed to the Emergency Department in A Tertiary Care Centre in South India

Manna Maria Theresa, Bharath Prasad S, T P Sreekrishnan, Gireesh Kumar, Prannoy George Mathen, Naveen Mohan, Sabarish Nair, Dhanasekaran BS, Kathyayini VR
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GB Score) is a validated screening tool used to predict the need for therapeutic interventions, such as blood transfusion and early endoscopy, in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). However, there is limited research regarding the optimal GB Score cut-off values for predicting these interventions in the Indian population. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to Compare GB score with the need for Blood Transfusion and to determine the cut-off GB scores that predict the need for blood transfusion and early endoscopy in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective comparative study done among 100 patients who presented to the ED with Upper GI bleed. Mean GB Score was compared among patients that required blood transfusion (50) and those that did not (50) and association of GB Score and need of blood transfusion and early endoscopy was found and a cut off score was calculated using ROC curve.(1,2) RESULTS: The mean GB Score was significantly higher in patients who received blood transfusions compared to those who did not (p<0.001), with a large effect size of 0.93. There was a statistically significant association between GB Score and blood transfusion (p=0.006), with an effect size of 0.27. The ROC curve for blood transfusion had an AUC of 67.8%, and the cut-off GB Score for predicting the need for transfusion was found to be 8 (p=0.002) with a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 46%. A significant association was found between GB Score and early endoscopy (p=0.001), with an effect size of 0.32. The cut-off GB Score for predicting the need for early endoscopy was found to be 9 (p=0.001) with 80.6% sensitivity and 54% specificity. DISCUSSIONS/CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a GB Score cut-off score of 8 for blood transfusion and 9 for early endoscopy can effectively predict the need for these interventions in patients with UGIB in the Indian population. Referring patients to a center with blood bank and endoscopy facilities is made easier by calculating the GB score in peripheral centers. Early intervention based on these scores may be associated with better clinical outcomes, including reduced need for invasive ventilation and lower in-hospital mortality. Larger RCTs are needed to confirm the results.

Indian Journal of Critical Care MedicineVol. 29(S1)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.