Accounting and Evolution of Global Spatial Explicit Blue and Green Water Footprint of Maize Production With Fewer Inputs

Abstract Gridded data updating for crop water consumption differentiating blue (i.e., irrigation water) and green (i.e., soil water) components at global scale is too hysteretic because of heavy working load and time cost of physical‐based models to prompt understanding and management of water for food. This study constructs a model for crop blue‐green water footprint (WF) with interpretability of physical processes. The modeling performance was tested at 5 arcminute resolution with the case for maize over the period 2000–2021, showing higher reliability in WF estimates for countries with high maize production (R 2 = 0.67–0.89) and robustness under extreme climate conditions. Results indicate the total WF of global maize production reached 898.1 × 10 9 m 3 yr −1 in 2021, a 50% increase since 2000. The current global average blue‐to‐total WF ratio was 13%. Markable spatiotemporal heterogeneities in the blue‐to‐total WF ratio of maize production are observed. Among major maize producers, South Africa experienced the most substantial increase in the blue‐to‐total WF ratio, rising from 1.3% in 2000 to 25.9% in 2021 (with highest blue uWF of 231 m 3 t −1 ), influenced by drought. This model provides a feasible approach to accounting and deviation of the non‐negligible variations between blue and green water consumption in crop production based on seven sets of data and fewer formulas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr037184
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting and Evolution of Global Spatial Explicit Blue and Green Water Footprint of Maize Production With Fewer Inputs

Rong Gao, La Zhuo, Yilin Liu, Pengcheng Tian et al.
1 citations
Water Resources Research
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

Accounting and Evolution of Global Spatial Explicit Blue and Green Water Footprint of Maize Production With Fewer Inputs

Rong Gao, La Zhuo, Yilin Liu, Pengcheng Tian, Pute Wu, Xiangxiang Ji
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Gridded data updating for crop water consumption differentiating blue (i.e., irrigation water) and green (i.e., soil water) components at global scale is too hysteretic because of heavy working load and time cost of physical‐based models to prompt understanding and management of water for food. This study constructs a model for crop blue‐green water footprint (WF) with interpretability of physical processes. The modeling performance was tested at 5 arcminute resolution with the case for maize over the period 2000–2021, showing higher reliability in WF estimates for countries with high maize production (R 2 = 0.67–0.89) and robustness under extreme climate conditions. Results indicate the total WF of global maize production reached 898.1 × 10 9 m 3 yr −1 in 2021, a 50% increase since 2000. The current global average blue‐to‐total WF ratio was 13%. Markable spatiotemporal heterogeneities in the blue‐to‐total WF ratio of maize production are observed. Among major maize producers, South Africa experienced the most substantial increase in the blue‐to‐total WF ratio, rising from 1.3% in 2000 to 25.9% in 2021 (with highest blue uWF of 231 m 3 t −1 ), influenced by drought. This model provides a feasible approach to accounting and deviation of the non‐negligible variations between blue and green water consumption in crop production based on seven sets of data and fewer formulas.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(6)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Soil and Water Conservation (CN), Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China (CN), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Cyrus Tang Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.