Global Ethical AI Data Standard: A framework for regulatory harmonization

The Global Ethical AI Data Standard (GEADS) introduces a comprehensive framework addressing fundamental challenges in artificial intelligence data governance. Production AI systems frequently exhibit inadequate provenance documentation and questionable consent mechanisms, while data annotation practices often lack transparency and fair compensation. The regulatory environment presents significant fragmentation across jurisdictions, with limited convergence in core data protection principles between major frameworks like GDPR and CCPA. Informed consent mechanisms fundamentally fail in AI contexts because traditional notice-and-consent frameworks cannot anticipate how machine learning might derive unexpected insights from data. GEADS addresses these challenges through a three-tier classification system based on data sensitivity and potential impact, implementing core principles of Transparent Provenance, Contextual Consent, Annotator Protections, Derivative Accountability, and Proportional Governance. The framework demonstrates high regulatory compatibility across jurisdictions while maintaining minimal technical overhead. Implementation results show significant improvements in consent comprehension, annotation quality, and ethical issue detection during development phases. Organizations adopting GEADS report reduced compliance costs, fewer regulatory inquiries, and improved stakeholder trust. The framework bridges policy requirements with technical implementation, creating actionable guidelines that harmonize diverse regulatory approaches while introducing AI-specific provisions that address unique challenges in machine learning data governance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2025.15.2.0851
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Ethical AI Data Standard: A framework for regulatory harmonization

Bhanu Teja Reddy Maryala
World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Global Ethical AI Data Standard: A framework for regulatory harmonization

Bhanu Teja Reddy Maryala
article en

Abstract

The Global Ethical AI Data Standard (GEADS) introduces a comprehensive framework addressing fundamental challenges in artificial intelligence data governance. Production AI systems frequently exhibit inadequate provenance documentation and questionable consent mechanisms, while data annotation practices often lack transparency and fair compensation. The regulatory environment presents significant fragmentation across jurisdictions, with limited convergence in core data protection principles between major frameworks like GDPR and CCPA. Informed consent mechanisms fundamentally fail in AI contexts because traditional notice-and-consent frameworks cannot anticipate how machine learning might derive unexpected insights from data. GEADS addresses these challenges through a three-tier classification system based on data sensitivity and potential impact, implementing core principles of Transparent Provenance, Contextual Consent, Annotator Protections, Derivative Accountability, and Proportional Governance. The framework demonstrates high regulatory compatibility across jurisdictions while maintaining minimal technical overhead. Implementation results show significant improvements in consent comprehension, annotation quality, and ethical issue detection during development phases. Organizations adopting GEADS report reduced compliance costs, fewer regulatory inquiries, and improved stakeholder trust. The framework bridges policy requirements with technical implementation, creating actionable guidelines that harmonize diverse regulatory approaches while introducing AI-specific provisions that address unique challenges in machine learning data governance.

World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and SciencesVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.