ANALYZING IACM IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA'S GOVERNMENT INTERNAL AUDIT USING MCKINSEY 7S FRAMEWORK

The capability assessment of Indonesia’s Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) has primarily relied on the Internal Audit Capability Model (IACM) as a formal framework. However, major corruption cases persisting in institutions with high IACM levels indicate a gap between formal capability scores and the actual effectiveness of APIP in preventing corruption. This study employs a qualitative case study approach and applies the McKinsey 7S Framework to analyze organizational factors that may not be optimally captured in the current IACM assessment. The study was conducted at three government levels (central, provincial, and local) through in-depth interviews and supporting document analysis. Findings reveal that elements such as leadership style, shared values, structure, and human resource quality significantly affect APIP effectiveness, yet are underrepresented in the IACM model. This research recommends integrating the McKinsey 7S Framework into the IACM assessment process to provide a more holistic and contextually accurate representation of APIP capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eduvest - Journal Of Universal Studies
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i5.51183
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALYZING IACM IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA'S GOVERNMENT INTERNAL AUDIT USING MCKINSEY 7S FRAMEWORK

Umanto Umanto, Muhammad Agi Pratama
Eduvest - Journal Of Universal Studies
Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
article

ANALYZING IACM IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA'S GOVERNMENT INTERNAL AUDIT USING MCKINSEY 7S FRAMEWORK

Umanto Umanto, Muhammad Agi Pratama
article en

Abstract

The capability assessment of Indonesia’s Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) has primarily relied on the Internal Audit Capability Model (IACM) as a formal framework. However, major corruption cases persisting in institutions with high IACM levels indicate a gap between formal capability scores and the actual effectiveness of APIP in preventing corruption. This study employs a qualitative case study approach and applies the McKinsey 7S Framework to analyze organizational factors that may not be optimally captured in the current IACM assessment. The study was conducted at three government levels (central, provincial, and local) through in-depth interviews and supporting document analysis. Findings reveal that elements such as leadership style, shared values, structure, and human resource quality significantly affect APIP effectiveness, yet are underrepresented in the IACM model. This research recommends integrating the McKinsey 7S Framework into the IACM assessment process to provide a more holistic and contextually accurate representation of APIP capabilities.

Eduvest - Journal Of Universal StudiesVol. 5(5)
University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.