Nietzsche a kontrafaktuální dějiny jako kardinální otázka historie

Counterfactual history has been a significant component of European historical culture since antiquity and remains today one of the popular methods of portraying history. On the other hand, modern historiography, by way of its methodology, is very skeptical of such an approach to the past, and this position is often repeated through the utterances of its protagonists. In one of his early preparatory notes, Friedrich Nie­tzsche called counterfactual history the “cardinal question” of history as such. The paper presented here aims to explore the context of this deliberation in the context of Nietzsche’s Basel period (1869–1879), especially in relation to texts with a historiographical dimension. Emphasis will also be placed on two of his prominent role models from that time – Thucydides and Jacob Burckhardt. Based on a historical-systematic analysis of his work (both published and in manuscript), this paper answers the question: “In what sense is counterfactual history a cardinal problem of history?”

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Filosofický časopis
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46854/fc.2025.2r.223
Primary Topic
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nietzsche a kontrafaktuální dějiny jako kardinální otázka historie

Marek Fapšo
Filosofický časopis
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
article

Nietzsche a kontrafaktuální dějiny jako kardinální otázka historie

Marek Fapšo
article en

Abstract

Counterfactual history has been a significant component of European historical culture since antiquity and remains today one of the popular methods of portraying history. On the other hand, modern historiography, by way of its methodology, is very skeptical of such an approach to the past, and this position is often repeated through the utterances of its protagonists. In one of his early preparatory notes, Friedrich Nie­tzsche called counterfactual history the “cardinal question” of history as such. The paper presented here aims to explore the context of this deliberation in the context of Nietzsche’s Basel period (1869–1879), especially in relation to texts with a historiographical dimension. Emphasis will also be placed on two of his prominent role models from that time – Thucydides and Jacob Burckhardt. Based on a historical-systematic analysis of his work (both published and in manuscript), this paper answers the question: “In what sense is counterfactual history a cardinal problem of history?”

Filosofický časopisVol. 73(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nietzsche a kontrafaktuální dějiny jako kardinální otázka historie — Marek Fapšo · Filosofický časopis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS