Comparison of machine learning models for predicting stroke risk in hypertensive patients: Lasso regression model, random forest model, Boruta algorithm model, and Boruta algorithm combined with Lasso regression model

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 4 machine learning models-Lasso regression model, random forest model, Boruta algorithm model, and the Boruta algorithm combined with Lasso regression-in predicting stroke risk among hypertensive patients. The study evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of each model to provide a more clinically valuable prediction model for stroke risk. The study included 3472 hypertensive patients, of which 312 had experienced a stroke, and 3160 had not. Various health indicators were analyzed using Lasso regression, random forest, Boruta algorithm, and the Boruta algorithm combined with Lasso regression. Model performance was evaluated based on the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve, the precision-recall curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis to assess classification ability, precision, calibration, and clinical benefit. The Lasso regression and Boruta algorithm models both have an AUC of 0.716, making them the best-performing models in terms of classification ability. The Boruta algorithm combined with Lasso regression model has an AUC of 0.705, slightly lower than the previous 2 models but still shows good predictive capability, with better interpretability due to feature selection. The random forest model has an AUC of 0.626, which is the lowest among the models, indicating weaker classification performance compared to the others. Among the 4 models, the Lasso regression model and Boruta algorithm model performed similarly in terms of classification ability, both demonstrating moderate predictive power, while the random forest model performed relatively poorly. The Boruta combined with Lasso regression model was precise in variable selection but had limited clinical utility. Therefore, the Lasso regression model appears to be the most balanced in predicting stroke risk and is the recommended model based on this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000042690
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of machine learning models for predicting stroke risk in hypertensive patients: Lasso regression model, random forest model, Boruta algorithm model, and Boruta algorithm combined with Lasso regression model

Jian Huang, Wencai Liu
4 citations
Medicine
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
5.42
article

Comparison of machine learning models for predicting stroke risk in hypertensive patients: Lasso regression model, random forest model, Boruta algorithm model, and Boruta algorithm combined with Lasso regression model

Jian Huang, Wencai Liu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 4 machine learning models-Lasso regression model, random forest model, Boruta algorithm model, and the Boruta algorithm combined with Lasso regression-in predicting stroke risk among hypertensive patients. The study evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of each model to provide a more clinically valuable prediction model for stroke risk. The study included 3472 hypertensive patients, of which 312 had experienced a stroke, and 3160 had not. Various health indicators were analyzed using Lasso regression, random forest, Boruta algorithm, and the Boruta algorithm combined with Lasso regression. Model performance was evaluated based on the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve, the precision-recall curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis to assess classification ability, precision, calibration, and clinical benefit. The Lasso regression and Boruta algorithm models both have an AUC of 0.716, making them the best-performing models in terms of classification ability. The Boruta algorithm combined with Lasso regression model has an AUC of 0.705, slightly lower than the previous 2 models but still shows good predictive capability, with better interpretability due to feature selection. The random forest model has an AUC of 0.626, which is the lowest among the models, indicating weaker classification performance compared to the others. Among the 4 models, the Lasso regression model and Boruta algorithm model performed similarly in terms of classification ability, both demonstrating moderate predictive power, while the random forest model performed relatively poorly. The Boruta combined with Lasso regression model was precise in variable selection but had limited clinical utility. Therefore, the Lasso regression model appears to be the most balanced in predicting stroke risk and is the recommended model based on this study.

MedicineVol. 104(22)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
5.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.