Julie C. Suk. <i>After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It</i>

In After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do About It, Julie Suk argues that a major cause of ongoing gender inequality in the United States and elsewhere is the systemic "overentitlement and overempowerment" of men compared to women.Suk labels this the problem of "misogyny," and notes that it long postdates the formal abolition of patriarchy, or even the disappearance of individual misogynists.One might quibble with the labeling. 1As Suk herself notes, misogyny has traditionally been understood as a form of hatred toward women.But following Kate Manne, Suk defines misogyny in broader terms, as "efforts to control women after the law has stopped embracing male supremacy" (at 10).For myself, I wonder if it is useful to view male overentitlement and overempowerment as something distinct-i.e., more like a form of "mantitlement" linked to implicit bias and structural gender inequality, rather than the hatred of women and of women's agency.In part, I think more distinct rather than all-encompassing labels may help point to more targeted policy interventions: for instance, misogyny may best be addressed through building men's own self-esteem in conjunction with exposure to powerful female figures.Mantitlement may best be addressed through different models of education and parenting, whereas structural overentitlement and overempowerment on the part of men may be better addressed by gender quotas, positive legal duties to protect women and girls, and radical changes to how we structure and reward care as opposed to other forms of labor. 2 But that is another debate for another day.For now, and for the purposes of this audience, it is important to focus on Suk's second argument: that constitutions provide an important response to this problem.The story of men's "overentitlement and overempowerment" compared to women (cis and trans) is alas not new.Feminist scholars-including Suk herself-have been drawing our attention to it for decades.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Constitutional Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaf022
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Julie C. Suk. After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It

Rosalind Dixon
International Journal of Constitutional Law
Gender, Security, and Conflict
article

Julie C. Suk. After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It

Rosalind Dixon
article en

Abstract

In After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do About It, Julie Suk argues that a major cause of ongoing gender inequality in the United States and elsewhere is the systemic "overentitlement and overempowerment" of men compared to women.Suk labels this the problem of "misogyny," and notes that it long postdates the formal abolition of patriarchy, or even the disappearance of individual misogynists.One might quibble with the labeling. 1As Suk herself notes, misogyny has traditionally been understood as a form of hatred toward women.But following Kate Manne, Suk defines misogyny in broader terms, as "efforts to control women after the law has stopped embracing male supremacy" (at 10).For myself, I wonder if it is useful to view male overentitlement and overempowerment as something distinct-i.e., more like a form of "mantitlement" linked to implicit bias and structural gender inequality, rather than the hatred of women and of women's agency.In part, I think more distinct rather than all-encompassing labels may help point to more targeted policy interventions: for instance, misogyny may best be addressed through building men's own self-esteem in conjunction with exposure to powerful female figures.Mantitlement may best be addressed through different models of education and parenting, whereas structural overentitlement and overempowerment on the part of men may be better addressed by gender quotas, positive legal duties to protect women and girls, and radical changes to how we structure and reward care as opposed to other forms of labor. 2 But that is another debate for another day.For now, and for the purposes of this audience, it is important to focus on Suk's second argument: that constitutions provide an important response to this problem.The story of men's "overentitlement and overempowerment" compared to women (cis and trans) is alas not new.Feminist scholars-including Suk herself-have been drawing our attention to it for decades.

International Journal of Constitutional LawVol. 23(1)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Julie C. Suk. <i>After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It</i> — Rosalind Dixon · International Journal of Constitutional Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS