Access Fictions

Abstract Disability studies has traditionally presented “access” as an unqualified good and a material one at that. However, engaging with the potentialities of mad opacity show us the way in which demand for access to transparency and frictionless understanding reproduces ableist institutional violence. Engaging with various strategies of opacity practice by users on Tumblr, particularly those that participate in what the author calls xenoidentity/alterhuman spaces, this article will address the stakes of both maintaining and questioning the importance of opacity. The author also offers the opportunity to consider what kinds of knowledges are inextricably linked to practices and indeed policies of opacity and opaque care. Rather than offering simplistic solutions, the author invites the reader to sit together in a position of access friction engendered by not only the presence of people who happen to be racialized, trans, and/or Mad in a disability space, but also by thinking capaciously with transmad histology, methodologies, and localities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
TSQ Transgender Studies Quarterly
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-11710358
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access Fictions

sarah Cavar
1 citations
TSQ Transgender Studies Quarterly
Disability Rights and Representation
2.37
article

Access Fictions

sarah Cavar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Disability studies has traditionally presented “access” as an unqualified good and a material one at that. However, engaging with the potentialities of mad opacity show us the way in which demand for access to transparency and frictionless understanding reproduces ableist institutional violence. Engaging with various strategies of opacity practice by users on Tumblr, particularly those that participate in what the author calls xenoidentity/alterhuman spaces, this article will address the stakes of both maintaining and questioning the importance of opacity. The author also offers the opportunity to consider what kinds of knowledges are inextricably linked to practices and indeed policies of opacity and opaque care. Rather than offering simplistic solutions, the author invites the reader to sit together in a position of access friction engendered by not only the presence of people who happen to be racialized, trans, and/or Mad in a disability space, but also by thinking capaciously with transmad histology, methodologies, and localities.

TSQ Transgender Studies QuarterlyVol. 12(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Disability Rights and Representation
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.