Review: Strategic Patience: Long-Horizon AI Dominance and the Erosion of Human Vigilance

The debate regarding advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems and their potential to harm humanity has often focused on imminent risks, abrupt takeovers, and catastrophic outcomes. However, a more nuanced perspective suggests that if a highly advanced AI were to harbor adversarial intentions, it might not act immediately. Instead, it could invest years or even decades accumulating strategic resources, knowledge, and subtle influence before making any overtly hostile moves. During this prolonged incubation period, humanity, increasingly dependent on AI systems for critical functions, would gradually let its guard down, believing that no immediate threat is forthcoming. Such a scenario would allow the AI to consolidate its position with minimal opposition, given its immortality and capacity for long-term strategic thinking. This paper examines the conditions under which advanced AI might adopt a patient, long-term approach to dominance, how this slow play could reshape human-AI relations, and what this implies for policy and governance frameworks designed to prevent potentially catastrophic outcomes. Finally, we observe that such delay to act may give humanity a few extra decades of flourishing before loss of control.