Prediction of Future Land Use and Land Cover Change Impact on Peak Flood: In Case of Babur Watershed, Tekeze Basin, Ethiopia

ABSTRACT Land use land cover (LULC) classification has been widely studied in remote sensing and GIS for agricultural, ecological, and hydrological processes. This study mainly focused on the prediction of the future impact of LULC change on peak stream flow through quantum GIS (QGIS) with the MOLUSCE plugin for LULC prediction, Geographical Information System (GIS) integrated with the HEC‐GeoHMS to prepare input data, and HEC‐HMS for hydrologic modeling. ERDAS IMAGINE was used to classify the watershed into six major LULC classes. Based on the Landsat image analyses for 1996–2016, the cropland area, built‐up area and vegetation had increased within two decades, and the annual rate of change was 0.11%, 0.83%, and 0.36%, respectively. However, forestland, shrubland, and bareland decreased at an annual rate of change of 0.26%, 0.21%, and 1.56%, respectively. The statistical downscaling model (SDSM) was used for the prediction of future rainfall of the Babur watershed, which helps to predict its future peak stream flow. The performance of the HEC‐HMS model was evaluated through sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validation. Both the calibration (1992–1998) and validation (1999–2001) results showed a good match between measured and simulated flow data with the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) of 0.72, percent of bias (PBIAS) of 1.60%, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.5, and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.774 for the calibration, and R 2 of 0.86, PBIAS of −9.54%, RMSE of 0.4, and NSE of 0.842 for the validation period. Because of the change in LULC, the peak flow has increased by 19.33% and 45.91% during 1996–2016 and 2016–2036, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70077
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of Future Land Use and Land Cover Change Impact on Peak Flood: In Case of Babur Watershed, Tekeze Basin, Ethiopia

Haddush Goitom, Gebremeskel Aregay, Teame Yisfa, Kahsu Hubot
1 citations
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
article

Prediction of Future Land Use and Land Cover Change Impact on Peak Flood: In Case of Babur Watershed, Tekeze Basin, Ethiopia

Haddush Goitom, Gebremeskel Aregay, Teame Yisfa, Kahsu Hubot
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Land use land cover (LULC) classification has been widely studied in remote sensing and GIS for agricultural, ecological, and hydrological processes. This study mainly focused on the prediction of the future impact of LULC change on peak stream flow through quantum GIS (QGIS) with the MOLUSCE plugin for LULC prediction, Geographical Information System (GIS) integrated with the HEC‐GeoHMS to prepare input data, and HEC‐HMS for hydrologic modeling. ERDAS IMAGINE was used to classify the watershed into six major LULC classes. Based on the Landsat image analyses for 1996–2016, the cropland area, built‐up area and vegetation had increased within two decades, and the annual rate of change was 0.11%, 0.83%, and 0.36%, respectively. However, forestland, shrubland, and bareland decreased at an annual rate of change of 0.26%, 0.21%, and 1.56%, respectively. The statistical downscaling model (SDSM) was used for the prediction of future rainfall of the Babur watershed, which helps to predict its future peak stream flow. The performance of the HEC‐HMS model was evaluated through sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validation. Both the calibration (1992–1998) and validation (1999–2001) results showed a good match between measured and simulated flow data with the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) of 0.72, percent of bias (PBIAS) of 1.60%, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.5, and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.774 for the calibration, and R 2 of 0.86, PBIAS of −9.54%, RMSE of 0.4, and NSE of 0.842 for the validation period. Because of the change in LULC, the peak flow has increased by 19.33% and 45.91% during 1996–2016 and 2016–2036, respectively.

Journal of Flood Risk ManagementVol. 18(2)
Mekelle University (ET), Aksum University (ET)
Ministry of Water Resources, Mekelle University
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.