The history of commercial freshwater mussel harvest in southern Ontario: a short-lived fishery with long-lasting consequences

Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) have long been an important aquatic resource for humans, and North America’sIndigenous nations have harvested them for over 10 000 years. European exploitation began in the latter half of the 19th century, initially focussing on the collection of pearls and later shifting to the manufacture of buttons at the onset of the 20th century. By 1911, Canadian pearl button factories operated in Windsor, Berlin (now Kitchener), and Trenton, Ontario, and, by 1921, Ontario shell was being exported to factories in the United States. The Canadian harvest did not last long and ended by the mid-1940s as resources dwindled because of overexploitation, pollution, and industrial shifts to other raw materials for buttons (e.g., plastics). Annual river-specific harvest ranged from ~ 66 to 110 tonnes with a maximum of 291 tonnes (~1.1–4.4 million animals) collected at Dunnville on the lower Grand River in 1915. Although detailed collection information is lacking, species such as Mucket (Actinonaias ligamentina), Threeridge (Amblema plicata), and Round Pigtoe (Pleurobema sintoxia, now listed federally as Endangered) were targetted, while Purple Wartyback (Cyclonaias tuberculata, also now Endangered) was discarded (i.e., killed). Commercial harvests typically targetted adults, because they provided the desired quantity and type of material, resulting in death. Recent studies have shown that this type of directed mortality can have the greatest impact on the long-term persistence of these populations and, although the specific impacts of the historical harvest cannot be determined, it is likely that these harvests contributed to the current state of imperilment of this fauna.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Canadian Field-Naturalist
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v138i3.3391
Primary Topic
Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The history of commercial freshwater mussel harvest in southern Ontario: a short-lived fishery with long-lasting consequences

Cherie W. Morris, Todd J. Morris
The Canadian Field-Naturalist
Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
article

The history of commercial freshwater mussel harvest in southern Ontario: a short-lived fishery with long-lasting consequences

Cherie W. Morris, Todd J. Morris
article en

Abstract

Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) have long been an important aquatic resource for humans, and North America’sIndigenous nations have harvested them for over 10 000 years. European exploitation began in the latter half of the 19th century, initially focussing on the collection of pearls and later shifting to the manufacture of buttons at the onset of the 20th century. By 1911, Canadian pearl button factories operated in Windsor, Berlin (now Kitchener), and Trenton, Ontario, and, by 1921, Ontario shell was being exported to factories in the United States. The Canadian harvest did not last long and ended by the mid-1940s as resources dwindled because of overexploitation, pollution, and industrial shifts to other raw materials for buttons (e.g., plastics). Annual river-specific harvest ranged from ~ 66 to 110 tonnes with a maximum of 291 tonnes (~1.1–4.4 million animals) collected at Dunnville on the lower Grand River in 1915. Although detailed collection information is lacking, species such as Mucket (Actinonaias ligamentina), Threeridge (Amblema plicata), and Round Pigtoe (Pleurobema sintoxia, now listed federally as Endangered) were targetted, while Purple Wartyback (Cyclonaias tuberculata, also now Endangered) was discarded (i.e., killed). Commercial harvests typically targetted adults, because they provided the desired quantity and type of material, resulting in death. Recent studies have shown that this type of directed mortality can have the greatest impact on the long-term persistence of these populations and, although the specific impacts of the historical harvest cannot be determined, it is likely that these harvests contributed to the current state of imperilment of this fauna.

The Canadian Field-NaturalistVol. 138(3)
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA)
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.