The ethics of AI decision-making: Balancing innovation and accountability

Attention from public domains and academic circles has intensified due to the way AI systems' decision-making enters various societal structures of healthcare, criminal justice, finance, and autonomous technologies. This paper explores how technology innovation and accountability aspects interlock in AI decision-making systems through examination of ethical structures together with regulatory voids and problems resulting from AI system implementations. The paper examines the decision-making processes of present AI systems while exploring auditability together with Explainability measures and determining liability when mistakes or discriminatory operations occur. The paper employs three case examples from facial identification systems, predictive crime analysis, and medical technology to prove how unrestrained development methods could sustain discrimination patterns while breaking public confidence. We present an ethical AI governance framework which depends on making the system visible and requiring human intervention together with consideration of specific circumstances. The study finds that ethical development of AI systems demands more than performance and efficiency since it requires the implementation of legally enforceable social accountability mechanisms. Social and economic systems require immediate mutual effort to develop AI systems that support human values and democratic principles.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.2.1548
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ethics of AI decision-making: Balancing innovation and accountability

Tejavardhana Chary Vishwakarma, Apoorva Kasoju
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The ethics of AI decision-making: Balancing innovation and accountability

Tejavardhana Chary Vishwakarma, Apoorva Kasoju
article en

Abstract

Attention from public domains and academic circles has intensified due to the way AI systems' decision-making enters various societal structures of healthcare, criminal justice, finance, and autonomous technologies. This paper explores how technology innovation and accountability aspects interlock in AI decision-making systems through examination of ethical structures together with regulatory voids and problems resulting from AI system implementations. The paper examines the decision-making processes of present AI systems while exploring auditability together with Explainability measures and determining liability when mistakes or discriminatory operations occur. The paper employs three case examples from facial identification systems, predictive crime analysis, and medical technology to prove how unrestrained development methods could sustain discrimination patterns while breaking public confidence. We present an ethical AI governance framework which depends on making the system visible and requiring human intervention together with consideration of specific circumstances. The study finds that ethical development of AI systems demands more than performance and efficiency since it requires the implementation of legally enforceable social accountability mechanisms. Social and economic systems require immediate mutual effort to develop AI systems that support human values and democratic principles.

International Journal of Science and Research ArchiveVol. 12(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.