Examining the Correlation between Presence in the University Ranking Systems with Countries’ Income and R&D Expenditure: A Study on Medical Sciences Universities

This study aims to examine the presence of various countries in international university ranking systems, specifically the Shanghai Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), QS, and the Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings, focusing on medicine and related sciences. It also explores the relationship between the presence in the university ranking systems and country’s income level and spending on Research and Development (R&D). Data was gathered from the websites of the three international university ranking systems, as well as from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the World Bank. Findings showed that 1191 universities from 100 countries are present in medical sciences sections of the three ranking systems. About half of these countries are classified as high-income, while fewer than five are classified as low-income. A significant correlation was found between a country’s income level and the number of its universities appearing in the rankings. High-income countries have a noticeably higher number of universities in these rankings than other income levels (p-value ≥ 0.001). Additionally, the study found a significant relationship between a country’s R&D spending and the presence of its universities in the rankings: THE (r = 0.33), QS (r = 0.24), and ARWU (r = 0.28). In conclusion, countries should consider increasing their investment in R&D to achieve higher positions in international university ranking systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.20443
Primary Topic
Business and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Correlation between Presence in the University Ranking Systems with Countries’ Income and R&D Expenditure: A Study on Medical Sciences Universities

Sara Jambarsang, Maryam Shekofteh, Azam Shahbodaghi, Romina Sepehr
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
Business and Economic Development
article

Examining the Correlation between Presence in the University Ranking Systems with Countries’ Income and R&D Expenditure: A Study on Medical Sciences Universities

Sara Jambarsang, Maryam Shekofteh, Azam Shahbodaghi, Romina Sepehr
article en

Abstract

This study aims to examine the presence of various countries in international university ranking systems, specifically the Shanghai Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), QS, and the Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings, focusing on medicine and related sciences. It also explores the relationship between the presence in the university ranking systems and country’s income level and spending on Research and Development (R&D). Data was gathered from the websites of the three international university ranking systems, as well as from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the World Bank. Findings showed that 1191 universities from 100 countries are present in medical sciences sections of the three ranking systems. About half of these countries are classified as high-income, while fewer than five are classified as low-income. A significant correlation was found between a country’s income level and the number of its universities appearing in the rankings. High-income countries have a noticeably higher number of universities in these rankings than other income levels (p-value ≥ 0.001). Additionally, the study found a significant relationship between a country’s R&D spending and the presence of its universities in the rankings: THE (r = 0.33), QS (r = 0.24), and ARWU (r = 0.28). In conclusion, countries should consider increasing their investment in R&D to achieve higher positions in international university ranking systems.

DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information TechnologyVol. 45(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Business and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.