Perception of Ethical Considerations in Social and Humanistic Research

Perception of ethical issues in academic and professional environment has become extremely essential with the increasing instances of misconduct in research. The present study tests the perception level of research scholars in the disciplines of social sciences and arts & humanities of Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi on various issues on research ethics. An open-ended questionnaire was distributed and 332 responses received from the scholars have been used for analysis. The results show researchers still perceived honesty (23 %), integrity/ dignity (18 %), responsible publication (10 %) as the top three issues under research ethics. There was lack of awareness on ethical issues like openness, informed consent, accountability etc. Scholars of social sciences and humanities are not well accustomed with existing ethical guidelines and they breach ethical norms. Despite several earlier studies mentioned that use of AI in research generate closely resemble existing research, therefore lacks transparency, non-neutral, hallucinated results, at least 34 % respondents are using/have used ChatGPT in research, mostly for academic writings followed by review of literature. Almost 36 % scholars have agreed that either they or their fellow researchers engaged in the data falsification, fabrication or manipulation in research, in spite, 52 % researchers believe in maintaining honesty, fairness and integrity in research is necessary. This research recommends the constitution of research ethics monitoring committee at university level to serve as a gatekeeper on the issues like informed consent, covert research, potentially sensitive topics, conflict of region, vulnerable participants.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.20459
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Science and Policy Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perception of Ethical Considerations in Social and Humanistic Research

Bhaskar Mukherjee
1 citations
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
Social Science and Policy Research
5.34
article

Perception of Ethical Considerations in Social and Humanistic Research

Bhaskar Mukherjee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Perception of ethical issues in academic and professional environment has become extremely essential with the increasing instances of misconduct in research. The present study tests the perception level of research scholars in the disciplines of social sciences and arts & humanities of Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi on various issues on research ethics. An open-ended questionnaire was distributed and 332 responses received from the scholars have been used for analysis. The results show researchers still perceived honesty (23 %), integrity/ dignity (18 %), responsible publication (10 %) as the top three issues under research ethics. There was lack of awareness on ethical issues like openness, informed consent, accountability etc. Scholars of social sciences and humanities are not well accustomed with existing ethical guidelines and they breach ethical norms. Despite several earlier studies mentioned that use of AI in research generate closely resemble existing research, therefore lacks transparency, non-neutral, hallucinated results, at least 34 % respondents are using/have used ChatGPT in research, mostly for academic writings followed by review of literature. Almost 36 % scholars have agreed that either they or their fellow researchers engaged in the data falsification, fabrication or manipulation in research, in spite, 52 % researchers believe in maintaining honesty, fairness and integrity in research is necessary. This research recommends the constitution of research ethics monitoring committee at university level to serve as a gatekeeper on the issues like informed consent, covert research, potentially sensitive topics, conflict of region, vulnerable participants.

DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information TechnologyVol. 45(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Science and Policy Research
5.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.