Downscaling GRACE total water storage data using random forest: a three-round validation approach under drought conditions

The application of GRACE satellite-derived Total Water Storage (TWS) data for local water management is constrained by its coarse spatial resolution (100-300 km). To address this limitation, a Random Forest-based model was employed to downscale GRACE TWS data from 100 km to 1 km resolution over Morocco, a drought-prone region, covering the period from 2002 to 2022. The input datasets included precipitation (GPM, 10 km), NDVI (MODIS, 1 km), land surface temperature (LST, MODIS, 1 km), evapotranspiration (MODIS, 500 m), elevation (SRTM, 30 m), and the Normalised Difference Snow Index (NDSI, MODIS, 500 m). While downscaling improves the spatial resolution of GRACE data, validating these higher-resolution outputs presents challenges. In this study, the downscaled data were validated using three complementary approaches: statistical validation, groundwater level in-situ data validation, and validation against known aquifer dynamics. Statistical validation demonstrated strong model performance, with a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.80, a low RMSE of 0.82 cm, and MAE of 0.57 cm, along with an R ² of 0.80 between original and downscaled data. Cross-validation confirmed the model’s consistency, yielding mean, median, and maximum R ² values of 0.56, 0.64, and 0.89 respectively. Error metrics remained consistently low throughout the study period, with MAE values ranging from 0.36 cm to 0.6 cm and RMSE values between 0.5 cm and 0.8 cm. Comparison with in-situ groundwater levels showed significant improvements, with correlation coefficients increasing for 63% of the 139 analysed wells. The 1 km TWS data revealed localised variations and clearer trends across different aquifers, with aquifer systems within the same structural domain exhibiting similar TWS patterns. These findings highlight the potential of the downscaling model to enhance local water management by capturing finer hydrological variations. The proposed approach effectively overcomes GRACE’s spatial resolution limitations, as demonstrated through comprehensive validation. This methodology shows particular promise for water resource monitoring in drought-vulnerable regions such as Morocco, providing decision-makers with higher-resolution data for improved water management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Water
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2025.1545821
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Downscaling GRACE total water storage data using random forest: a three-round validation approach under drought conditions

Ismail Mohsine, Mohamed Abdellah Ezzaouini, Sarah Tweed, Mounia Tahiri et al.
4 citations
Frontiers in Water
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
7.17
article

Downscaling GRACE total water storage data using random forest: a three-round validation approach under drought conditions

Ismail Mohsine, Mohamed Abdellah Ezzaouini, Sarah Tweed, Mounia Tahiri, A. Zerouali, Nadia Kassou, Tarik Bouramtane, Ali El Bilali, Marc Leblanc, Ilias Kacimi, Omar Chafki, Youssef Hamou-Ali, Siham Laraichi, Nourlhouda Karmouda
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The application of GRACE satellite-derived Total Water Storage (TWS) data for local water management is constrained by its coarse spatial resolution (100-300 km). To address this limitation, a Random Forest-based model was employed to downscale GRACE TWS data from 100 km to 1 km resolution over Morocco, a drought-prone region, covering the period from 2002 to 2022. The input datasets included precipitation (GPM, 10 km), NDVI (MODIS, 1 km), land surface temperature (LST, MODIS, 1 km), evapotranspiration (MODIS, 500 m), elevation (SRTM, 30 m), and the Normalised Difference Snow Index (NDSI, MODIS, 500 m). While downscaling improves the spatial resolution of GRACE data, validating these higher-resolution outputs presents challenges. In this study, the downscaled data were validated using three complementary approaches: statistical validation, groundwater level in-situ data validation, and validation against known aquifer dynamics. Statistical validation demonstrated strong model performance, with a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.80, a low RMSE of 0.82 cm, and MAE of 0.57 cm, along with an R ² of 0.80 between original and downscaled data. Cross-validation confirmed the model’s consistency, yielding mean, median, and maximum R ² values of 0.56, 0.64, and 0.89 respectively. Error metrics remained consistently low throughout the study period, with MAE values ranging from 0.36 cm to 0.6 cm and RMSE values between 0.5 cm and 0.8 cm. Comparison with in-situ groundwater levels showed significant improvements, with correlation coefficients increasing for 63% of the 139 analysed wells. The 1 km TWS data revealed localised variations and clearer trends across different aquifers, with aquifer systems within the same structural domain exhibiting similar TWS patterns. These findings highlight the potential of the downscaling model to enhance local water management by capturing finer hydrological variations. The proposed approach effectively overcomes GRACE’s spatial resolution limitations, as demonstrated through comprehensive validation. This methodology shows particular promise for water resource monitoring in drought-vulnerable regions such as Morocco, providing decision-makers with higher-resolution data for improved water management strategies.

Frontiers in WaterVol. 7
Mohammed V University (MA), Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse (FR), Office National de l'Eau Potable (MA), École Normale Supérieure de Tétouan (MA), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
7.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.