Development and validation of the scale of aesthetics and creativity in chess

This study examined the psychometric quality of the Scale of Aesthetics and Creativity in Chess (SACC) with the data collected from 132 expert and non-expert chess players. To analyze the validity, reliability, and item functioning within the scale, the Many-facet Rasch model was applied. The Rasch measure explained 50.59% of the variance in scores and provided evidence for the scale's unidimensionality. The reliability indices for items and participants were 0.83 and 0.93, respectively. The expertise level of chess players predicted scores on the SACC; however, Intermediate level players showed the lowest scores in comparison with Expert, Advanced, and Beginner level participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1545846
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of the scale of aesthetics and creativity in chess

Kadir Bahar, George Engelhard, Alisa Scherbakova
1 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
2.12
article

Development and validation of the scale of aesthetics and creativity in chess

Kadir Bahar, George Engelhard, Alisa Scherbakova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric quality of the Scale of Aesthetics and Creativity in Chess (SACC) with the data collected from 132 expert and non-expert chess players. To analyze the validity, reliability, and item functioning within the scale, the Many-facet Rasch model was applied. The Rasch measure explained 50.59% of the variance in scores and provided evidence for the scale's unidimensionality. The reliability indices for items and participants were 0.83 and 0.93, respectively. The expertise level of chess players predicted scores on the SACC; however, Intermediate level players showed the lowest scores in comparison with Expert, Advanced, and Beginner level participants.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
University of Georgia (US), Ball State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.