A contrastive study of pragmatic and semantic features in typical and atypical comparative constructions across English, Chinese, Russian, and Turkmen: cognitive interpretations explored

This article presents a contrastive analysis that sheds light on the similarities and differences of comparative constructions in English, Chinese, Russian, and Turkmen, and the reasons behind them from a cognitive perspective. Specifically, based on the analysis of the massive online English, Chinese, and Russian corpora, namely the Corpus of Contemporary American English, the Russian National Corpus, the Center for Chinese Linguistics Corpus, and the self-built Turkmen corpus data, this study focuses on pragmatic and semantic features of typical and atypical comparatives, providing a comprehensive analysis of their resemblances and distinctions. The similarities are chiefly exhibited in the prominent usage of typical comparative constructions, the occurrence of comparative deletion, and atypical semantic features based on the typical ones. The differences mainly lie in the preference for typical synthetic or analytic forms and the distribution between concrete and abstract atypical forms, expression forms of degree semantics in typical comparatives, and semantic types of atypical comparatives. The cognitive interpretations for the similarities of the typical and atypical comparative constructions in the mentioned languages are mainly reflected in human cognition toward the comparatives. The cognitive interpretations for the differences are mainly manifested in the diverse levels of salience and specificity of construal modes in the context of comparison.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1513434
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A contrastive study of pragmatic and semantic features in typical and atypical comparative constructions across English, Chinese, Russian, and Turkmen: cognitive interpretations explored

Annagul Annamyradova
1 citations
Frontiers in Education
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
10.42
article

A contrastive study of pragmatic and semantic features in typical and atypical comparative constructions across English, Chinese, Russian, and Turkmen: cognitive interpretations explored

Annagul Annamyradova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article presents a contrastive analysis that sheds light on the similarities and differences of comparative constructions in English, Chinese, Russian, and Turkmen, and the reasons behind them from a cognitive perspective. Specifically, based on the analysis of the massive online English, Chinese, and Russian corpora, namely the Corpus of Contemporary American English, the Russian National Corpus, the Center for Chinese Linguistics Corpus, and the self-built Turkmen corpus data, this study focuses on pragmatic and semantic features of typical and atypical comparatives, providing a comprehensive analysis of their resemblances and distinctions. The similarities are chiefly exhibited in the prominent usage of typical comparative constructions, the occurrence of comparative deletion, and atypical semantic features based on the typical ones. The differences mainly lie in the preference for typical synthetic or analytic forms and the distribution between concrete and abstract atypical forms, expression forms of degree semantics in typical comparatives, and semantic types of atypical comparatives. The cognitive interpretations for the similarities of the typical and atypical comparative constructions in the mentioned languages are mainly reflected in human cognition toward the comparatives. The cognitive interpretations for the differences are mainly manifested in the diverse levels of salience and specificity of construal modes in the context of comparison.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Hunan Normal University (CN), Changsha Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.