Feeling responsible for reducing climate change: a multi-level European study on the role of religion and state

Feelings of being responsible for reducing climate change can stimulate climate action. These feelings may depend on the broader cultural (e.g. religious) and social context (e.g. social and environmental welfare expenditure) in which one lives, as well as on individual beliefs and attitudes, such as religiosity, religion and welfare attitudes. This study analyses data from the European Social Survey Round 8 to gain a better understanding of how contextual and individual factors relate to feelings of responsibility toward climate change reduction across European countries. Our findings highlight the association of religions with feelings of responsibility, with Muslims and non-religious people feeling more responsible compared to Christians. Only non-religious people feel more responsible to reduce climate change when expenditures for environmental protection increase. Furthermore, the religious context and individual level of religiosity were found to not affect feelings of responsibility. More positive welfare attitudes were shown to result in greater feelings of responsibility to reduce climate change. The nature of state expenditure (social vs. environmental protection) were found to have an effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Sociology
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2025.2512606
Primary Topic
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeling responsible for reducing climate change: a multi-level European study on the role of religion and state

Lore Van Praag, David De Coninck
Environmental Sociology
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
article

Feeling responsible for reducing climate change: a multi-level European study on the role of religion and state

Lore Van Praag, David De Coninck
article en

Abstract

Feelings of being responsible for reducing climate change can stimulate climate action. These feelings may depend on the broader cultural (e.g. religious) and social context (e.g. social and environmental welfare expenditure) in which one lives, as well as on individual beliefs and attitudes, such as religiosity, religion and welfare attitudes. This study analyses data from the European Social Survey Round 8 to gain a better understanding of how contextual and individual factors relate to feelings of responsibility toward climate change reduction across European countries. Our findings highlight the association of religions with feelings of responsibility, with Muslims and non-religious people feeling more responsible compared to Christians. Only non-religious people feel more responsible to reduce climate change when expenditures for environmental protection increase. Furthermore, the religious context and individual level of religiosity were found to not affect feelings of responsibility. More positive welfare attitudes were shown to result in greater feelings of responsibility to reduce climate change. The nature of state expenditure (social vs. environmental protection) were found to have an effect.

Environmental Sociology
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.