Interface engineering for silicon/carbon composite anode in all-solid-state batteries

Silicon-based anode is one of the most promising candidates for all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs), which however needs to be further improved for its tremendous volume change. This study investigates interface treatment strategies for SiO/carbon composite anodes in ASSBs through a multiphysics modeling framework. By evaluating the effects of active (carbon) and inactive coating materials, as well as geometric and mechanical parameters, the research reveals critical insights into optimizing electrochemical performance and mechanical stability. Computational results demonstrate that carbon coatings significantly enhance lithiation kinetics by regulating interfacial electrochemical potential gradients, reducing residual lithium concentration, and homogenizing lithium-ion distribution compared to uncoated or inactive-coated configurations. Thinner carbon coatings further improve capacity retention and stress management by balancing shorter lithium diffusion pathways with mitigated interfacial stress accumulation. Inactive coatings, while mechanically stabilizing the anode, exhibit tradeoffs between lithium transport kinetics and stress modulation, with optimal performance achieved at lower Young’s moduli. Mechanical analyses highlight distinct failure mechanisms at anode-electrolyte (shear-driven) and particle-coating (tension-driven) interfaces, emphasizing the need for tailored adhesion strategies. These findings provide actionable guidelines for designing robust SiO-based anodes, emphasizing the interplay between electrochemical efficiency, stress regulation, and interfacial durability in ASSBs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Materials and Devices
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/emd.2025.9370067
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interface engineering for silicon/carbon composite anode in all-solid-state batteries

Xiang Gao, Jianwen Zhang, Linan Jia
5 citations
Energy Materials and Devices
Advancements in Battery Materials
3.65
article

Interface engineering for silicon/carbon composite anode in all-solid-state batteries

Xiang Gao, Jianwen Zhang, Linan Jia
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Silicon-based anode is one of the most promising candidates for all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs), which however needs to be further improved for its tremendous volume change. This study investigates interface treatment strategies for SiO/carbon composite anodes in ASSBs through a multiphysics modeling framework. By evaluating the effects of active (carbon) and inactive coating materials, as well as geometric and mechanical parameters, the research reveals critical insights into optimizing electrochemical performance and mechanical stability. Computational results demonstrate that carbon coatings significantly enhance lithiation kinetics by regulating interfacial electrochemical potential gradients, reducing residual lithium concentration, and homogenizing lithium-ion distribution compared to uncoated or inactive-coated configurations. Thinner carbon coatings further improve capacity retention and stress management by balancing shorter lithium diffusion pathways with mitigated interfacial stress accumulation. Inactive coatings, while mechanically stabilizing the anode, exhibit tradeoffs between lithium transport kinetics and stress modulation, with optimal performance achieved at lower Young’s moduli. Mechanical analyses highlight distinct failure mechanisms at anode-electrolyte (shear-driven) and particle-coating (tension-driven) interfaces, emphasizing the need for tailored adhesion strategies. These findings provide actionable guidelines for designing robust SiO-based anodes, emphasizing the interplay between electrochemical efficiency, stress regulation, and interfacial durability in ASSBs.

Energy Materials and DevicesVol. 3(3)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advancements in Battery Materials
3.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.