Factors Affecting Forest Growth-to-Drain Ratio at Sub-regional Scale in Arkansas, USA

Abstract The forest growth-to-drain ratio (FGDR) serves as a pivotal gauge for forest sustainability. Over the last four decades, FGDR has ranged from 0.66 to more than 2.5 in the southern United States, however, the underlying factors affecting this ratio are not well understood. We employed a mixed-effects model to obtain better insights into factors affecting FGDR on a sub-regional (county) scale in Arkansas. Results showed an overall 1.6 FGDR indicating net forest growth was higher than removals. The ratio was higher in hardwood as compared to softwood due to demand for softwood and most mills are located in the softwood-dominated region of the state. Factors such as number of consulting foresters and area of forestland showed negative statistical significance to the FGDR whereas income from forestry showed positive statistical significance. Effective outreach programs are imperative to increase public acceptance and capitalize on the socio-economic and ecological benefits of wood utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forestry
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44392-025-00034-z
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Affecting Forest Growth-to-Drain Ratio at Sub-regional Scale in Arkansas, USA

Pradip Saud, Matthew H. Pelkki, Sagar Godar Chhetri
Journal of Forestry
Forest ecology and management
article

Factors Affecting Forest Growth-to-Drain Ratio at Sub-regional Scale in Arkansas, USA

Pradip Saud, Matthew H. Pelkki, Sagar Godar Chhetri
article en

Abstract

Abstract The forest growth-to-drain ratio (FGDR) serves as a pivotal gauge for forest sustainability. Over the last four decades, FGDR has ranged from 0.66 to more than 2.5 in the southern United States, however, the underlying factors affecting this ratio are not well understood. We employed a mixed-effects model to obtain better insights into factors affecting FGDR on a sub-regional (county) scale in Arkansas. Results showed an overall 1.6 FGDR indicating net forest growth was higher than removals. The ratio was higher in hardwood as compared to softwood due to demand for softwood and most mills are located in the softwood-dominated region of the state. Factors such as number of consulting foresters and area of forestland showed negative statistical significance to the FGDR whereas income from forestry showed positive statistical significance. Effective outreach programs are imperative to increase public acceptance and capitalize on the socio-economic and ecological benefits of wood utilization.

Journal of ForestryVol. 123(4)
University of Arkansas at Monticello (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Forest ecology and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.