Bi‐Material Effects on Critical Jump Distance Over Step‐Overs

Abstract Step‐overs can impede rupture propagation, but if breached, they may generate a large destructive earthquake. By performing dynamic rupture simulations on step‐overs in both homogeneous and bi‐material media, we demonstrate that the bi‐material effect significantly influences the critical jump distance, the maximum jump step width that a rupture can jump across. In the positive direction, which is defined as the direction of motion of the softer material, the critical jump distance is greatly enlarged, especially on the compliant side, because of the existence of a tensile normal stress pulse and large slip pulse. In the homogeneous case the rupture can jump only a 1 km releasing step and is stopped by a 1 km restraining step. In contrast, with a 20% material contrast in wave velocity, the critical jump distance increases to 11 km for restraining steps, and 2 km for releasing steps. In the negative direction, supershear rupture is easier to generate because of stress perturbation beyond the rupture front. Besides the Burridge‐Andrews supershear, direct‐transition supershear can also be noticed in the negative direction under certain condition. However, the critical jump distance in the negative direction is still suppressed because of the dominant bi‐material effect over the supershear effect. Our study may shed light on the earthquake hazard assessment due to step‐overs in bi‐material media.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb030992
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bi‐Material Effects on Critical Jump Distance Over Step‐Overs

Feng Hu, D. D. Oglesby, Wenqiang Zhang, Zeyu Lu
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
0.71
article

Bi‐Material Effects on Critical Jump Distance Over Step‐Overs

Feng Hu, D. D. Oglesby, Wenqiang Zhang, Zeyu Lu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Step‐overs can impede rupture propagation, but if breached, they may generate a large destructive earthquake. By performing dynamic rupture simulations on step‐overs in both homogeneous and bi‐material media, we demonstrate that the bi‐material effect significantly influences the critical jump distance, the maximum jump step width that a rupture can jump across. In the positive direction, which is defined as the direction of motion of the softer material, the critical jump distance is greatly enlarged, especially on the compliant side, because of the existence of a tensile normal stress pulse and large slip pulse. In the homogeneous case the rupture can jump only a 1 km releasing step and is stopped by a 1 km restraining step. In contrast, with a 20% material contrast in wave velocity, the critical jump distance increases to 11 km for restraining steps, and 2 km for releasing steps. In the negative direction, supershear rupture is easier to generate because of stress perturbation beyond the rupture front. Besides the Burridge‐Andrews supershear, direct‐transition supershear can also be noticed in the negative direction under certain condition. However, the critical jump distance in the negative direction is still suppressed because of the dominant bi‐material effect over the supershear effect. Our study may shed light on the earthquake hazard assessment due to step‐overs in bi‐material media.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 130(6)
University of California, Riverside (US), University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Institute of Geophysics (RU), Stanford Medicine (US)
Southern California Earthquake Center, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, U.S. Geological Survey, Youth Innovation Promotion Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.