Pengawasan Internal terhadap Tindakan Koruptif Pejabat Pemerintahan Daerah oleh Aparatur Pengawasan Intern Pemerintahan (Studi Kasus Pemerasan Kepala Dinas Provinsi Bengkulu)

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of internal supervision conducted by the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), particularly the Regional Inspectorate, in preventing and addressing corruption within local governments. The research uses a normative juridical approach by analyzing laws and regulations, combined with case studies specifically, extortion practices within the Bengkulu Provincial Government. The findings reveal that internal supervision has not functioned optimally. Several factors contribute to this ineffectiveness, including the failure of the internal control system, limited independence of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), and insufficient coordination with external oversight bodies. These issues suggest that the current internal supervision mechanism remains vulnerable to political intervention and is inadequate in detecting or preventing structural corruption. In practice, the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) often lacks the authority and resources necessary to carry out thorough and independent investigations, especially in politically sensitive cases. To address these shortcomings, the study recommends a series of reforms. These include strengthening the institutional position and independence of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), revising and updating technical regulations related to the Government Internal Control System (SPIP), and enhancing coordination and information-sharing between internal and external supervisory institutions. A more empowered and independent the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) would be better equipped to uphold integrity, transparency, and accountability in local governance. In conclusion, comprehensive improvements in internal supervision are essential to support anti-corruption efforts and ensure good governance at the regional level. Strengthening internal control is not only a legal necessity but also a strategic step toward building public trust in government institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i4.4108
Primary Topic
Public Administration in Developing Nations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pengawasan Internal terhadap Tindakan Koruptif Pejabat Pemerintahan Daerah oleh Aparatur Pengawasan Intern Pemerintahan (Studi Kasus Pemerasan Kepala Dinas Provinsi Bengkulu)

Linda Rahwa Wati, Tania Putri Vianka, Nurul Adzkia, Pipi Susanti
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice
Public Administration in Developing Nations
article

Pengawasan Internal terhadap Tindakan Koruptif Pejabat Pemerintahan Daerah oleh Aparatur Pengawasan Intern Pemerintahan (Studi Kasus Pemerasan Kepala Dinas Provinsi Bengkulu)

Linda Rahwa Wati, Tania Putri Vianka, Nurul Adzkia, Pipi Susanti
article en

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of internal supervision conducted by the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), particularly the Regional Inspectorate, in preventing and addressing corruption within local governments. The research uses a normative juridical approach by analyzing laws and regulations, combined with case studies specifically, extortion practices within the Bengkulu Provincial Government. The findings reveal that internal supervision has not functioned optimally. Several factors contribute to this ineffectiveness, including the failure of the internal control system, limited independence of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), and insufficient coordination with external oversight bodies. These issues suggest that the current internal supervision mechanism remains vulnerable to political intervention and is inadequate in detecting or preventing structural corruption. In practice, the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) often lacks the authority and resources necessary to carry out thorough and independent investigations, especially in politically sensitive cases. To address these shortcomings, the study recommends a series of reforms. These include strengthening the institutional position and independence of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), revising and updating technical regulations related to the Government Internal Control System (SPIP), and enhancing coordination and information-sharing between internal and external supervisory institutions. A more empowered and independent the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) would be better equipped to uphold integrity, transparency, and accountability in local governance. In conclusion, comprehensive improvements in internal supervision are essential to support anti-corruption efforts and ensure good governance at the regional level. Strengthening internal control is not only a legal necessity but also a strategic step toward building public trust in government institutions.

Indonesian Journal of Law and JusticeVol. 2(4)
University of Bengkulu (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Public Administration in Developing Nations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.