Assessment of the introduction of a progressive consumption tax in Russia

The subject of this article is the assessment of the feasibility of introducing a progressive consumption tax (PCT) in the Russian Federation as an alternative to the existing taxation system, which includes value-added tax (VAT), corporate income tax, and personal income tax (PIT). The possibility of forming a new tax model based on the taxation of final consumption using a progressive rate scale is considered. The article analyzes the features of the PCT mechanism, its impact on taxpayer behavior, investment activity, savings, and macroeconomic indicators. Additionally, attention is given to issues of tax fairness, sustainability of tax revenues, and administrative costs. The research examines international experience, including tax models in Estonia, Singapore, and the USA, to identify relevant benchmarks for Russia. A comparative analysis of the existing and proposed systems is conducted based on key criteria of tax policy. Methods of comparative analysis, modeling tax burden, systematic evaluation of fiscal efficiency, and interpretation of macroeconomic scenarios based on normative and empirical data are used. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the development and justification of a new tax model focused on final consumption, while applying a progressive rate scale to achieve social justice. Unlike the current tax system, the PCT offers the elimination of income taxation and reinvested profits, which reduces distortions in economic behavior and stimulates long-term savings and investments. The findings of the research indicate the potential to replace VAT, corporate income tax, and PIT with a unified tax structure while maintaining fiscal stability of the budget. Advantages of the PCT, such as reducing inflationary pressure, simplifying administration, combating tax evasion, and increasing horizontal and vertical tax fairness, are highlighted. The study substantiates that with the technical and institutional preparation, the introduction of the PCT can enhance the competitiveness of the Russian tax system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Налоги и налогообложение
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-065x.2025.3.74521
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the introduction of a progressive consumption tax in Russia

Semen Aleksandrovich Shamaev
Налоги и налогообложение
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
article

Assessment of the introduction of a progressive consumption tax in Russia

Semen Aleksandrovich Shamaev
article en

Abstract

The subject of this article is the assessment of the feasibility of introducing a progressive consumption tax (PCT) in the Russian Federation as an alternative to the existing taxation system, which includes value-added tax (VAT), corporate income tax, and personal income tax (PIT). The possibility of forming a new tax model based on the taxation of final consumption using a progressive rate scale is considered. The article analyzes the features of the PCT mechanism, its impact on taxpayer behavior, investment activity, savings, and macroeconomic indicators. Additionally, attention is given to issues of tax fairness, sustainability of tax revenues, and administrative costs. The research examines international experience, including tax models in Estonia, Singapore, and the USA, to identify relevant benchmarks for Russia. A comparative analysis of the existing and proposed systems is conducted based on key criteria of tax policy. Methods of comparative analysis, modeling tax burden, systematic evaluation of fiscal efficiency, and interpretation of macroeconomic scenarios based on normative and empirical data are used. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the development and justification of a new tax model focused on final consumption, while applying a progressive rate scale to achieve social justice. Unlike the current tax system, the PCT offers the elimination of income taxation and reinvested profits, which reduces distortions in economic behavior and stimulates long-term savings and investments. The findings of the research indicate the potential to replace VAT, corporate income tax, and PIT with a unified tax structure while maintaining fiscal stability of the budget. Advantages of the PCT, such as reducing inflationary pressure, simplifying administration, combating tax evasion, and increasing horizontal and vertical tax fairness, are highlighted. The study substantiates that with the technical and institutional preparation, the introduction of the PCT can enhance the competitiveness of the Russian tax system.

Налоги и налогообложение(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.