Bridging the gap: Advancing policy process theory through the study of policing subsystems

Abstract For more than forty years, giants in the field have argued that the study of policing can deepen our understanding of key concepts in the policy process literature. Despite this, there remains a noticeable gap in policy‐driven policing research. This article revisits that gap—not solely to integrate policing into policy process research, but to show how policing subsystems offer unique opportunities for researchers to test and refine core policy theories. To do so, we explore how several concepts central to contemporary theories of the policy process—issue networks, policy diffusion, interdependence, and critical theory—can be applied to policing. By comparing policing subsystems to more frequently studied domains (such as environmental arenas), we highlight how this research enables policy scholars to expand, refine, and/or challenge core concepts and themes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies Journal
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70032
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the gap: Advancing policy process theory through the study of policing subsystems

Jack Mewhirter, Sean Nicholson‐Crotty, Jill Nicholson‐Crotty, James E. Wright
3 citations
Policy Studies Journal
Policy Transfer and Learning
25.57
article

Bridging the gap: Advancing policy process theory through the study of policing subsystems

Jack Mewhirter, Sean Nicholson‐Crotty, Jill Nicholson‐Crotty, James E. Wright
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract For more than forty years, giants in the field have argued that the study of policing can deepen our understanding of key concepts in the policy process literature. Despite this, there remains a noticeable gap in policy‐driven policing research. This article revisits that gap—not solely to integrate policing into policy process research, but to show how policing subsystems offer unique opportunities for researchers to test and refine core policy theories. To do so, we explore how several concepts central to contemporary theories of the policy process—issue networks, policy diffusion, interdependence, and critical theory—can be applied to policing. By comparing policing subsystems to more frequently studied domains (such as environmental arenas), we highlight how this research enables policy scholars to expand, refine, and/or challenge core concepts and themes.

Policy Studies JournalVol. 54(1)
Indiana University Bloomington (US), Arizona State University (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Policy Transfer and Learning
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging the gap: Advancing policy process theory through the study of policing subsystems — Jack Mewhirter, Sean Nicholson‐Crotty, et al. · Policy Studies Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS