Body Weight Estimation in Holstein × Zebu Crossbred Heifers: Comparative Analysis of XGBoost and LightGBM Algorithms

This study evaluates the effectiveness of XGBoost and LightGBM algorithms for estimating the live weight of Holstein×Zebu crossbred heifers. The study compares the performance of both algorithms using a wide range of biometric measurements and tests various hyperparameter settings. The research results show that the XGBoost algorithm provides almost perfect agreement with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.999 on the training set and high performance with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.986 on the test set. The LightGBM algorithm also achieved effective results with R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.986 and 0.981 on both training and test sets. The machine learning algorithms used in the current study stand out as having the potential to provide a practical and economical solution for live weight estimation in livestock enterprises and especially for herd management applications in rural areas through input variables such as body measurements, milk yield, etc. However, the obtained results in the current study reveal the potential of machine learning algorithms for live weight estimation in the livestock sector and indicate that advanced research is needed for the optimisation of these algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Medicine and Science
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70422
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Body Weight Estimation in Holstein × Zebu Crossbred Heifers: Comparative Analysis of XGBoost and LightGBM Algorithms

Alfonso Juventino Chay‐Canul, Kadyrbai Chekirov, Lütfi Bayyurt, José Herrera-Camacho et al.
3 citations
Veterinary Medicine and Science
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
3.58
article

Body Weight Estimation in Holstein × Zebu Crossbred Heifers: Comparative Analysis of XGBoost and LightGBM Algorithms

Alfonso Juventino Chay‐Canul, Kadyrbai Chekirov, Lütfi Bayyurt, José Herrera-Camacho, Cem Tırınk, Rashit Uskenov, Aizhan Makhanbetova, Karlygash Omarova, Rosa Inés Parra‐Cortés
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of XGBoost and LightGBM algorithms for estimating the live weight of Holstein×Zebu crossbred heifers. The study compares the performance of both algorithms using a wide range of biometric measurements and tests various hyperparameter settings. The research results show that the XGBoost algorithm provides almost perfect agreement with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.999 on the training set and high performance with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.986 on the test set. The LightGBM algorithm also achieved effective results with R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.986 and 0.981 on both training and test sets. The machine learning algorithms used in the current study stand out as having the potential to provide a practical and economical solution for live weight estimation in livestock enterprises and especially for herd management applications in rural areas through input variables such as body measurements, milk yield, etc. However, the obtained results in the current study reveal the potential of machine learning algorithms for live weight estimation in the livestock sector and indicate that advanced research is needed for the optimisation of these algorithms.

Veterinary Medicine and ScienceVol. 11(4)
Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo (MX), Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR), University of Applied and Environmental Sciences (CO), Iğdır Üniversitesi (TR), S.Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University (KZ), Kyrgyz-Türkish Manas Üniversity (KG), Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.