Industrial study on holistic digital factory models

Abstract Although studies have demonstrated the potential of holistic digital factory models, their application in industry remains limited. There is a research gap as to why this is the case. In particular, the starting point of the factory operators and their specific requirements for such models are still unclear. This paper presents a mixed-methods study that addresses the existing research gap regarding the implementation of holistic digital factory models. The study investigates the evolving understanding of factory planning, emphasizing the transition from one-time projects to continuous tasks. The key findings reveal a significant need for cross-life-cycle information continuity, highlighting the importance of collaboration and data integration among stakeholders. The research identifies obstacles to achieving holistic digital factory planning, including knowledge management and data availability challenges. Furthermore, the applicability of existing technologies for holistic digital factory models, such as Building Information Modeling and Digital Twins, is examined, demonstrating their relevance in factory planning. Additionally, it is shown that while there is an apparent demand for standardized methods and tools, many existing methodologies are underutilized. The paper concludes with recommendations to further investigate the contrasts between literature and industry practices, as well as the implementation of shared data environments to enhance the efficiency of factory planning processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Production Engineering
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-025-01344-z
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industrial study on holistic digital factory models

Rüdiger Daub, Fabian Bermpohl, Simon F. Schäfer, Thomas Neuhäuser et al.
4 citations
Production Engineering
Digital Transformation in Industry
4.97
article

Industrial study on holistic digital factory models

Rüdiger Daub, Fabian Bermpohl, Simon F. Schäfer, Thomas Neuhäuser, Thomas Dickopf, Oliver Neumann, Eckart Reihlen, Thomas Gebel
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Although studies have demonstrated the potential of holistic digital factory models, their application in industry remains limited. There is a research gap as to why this is the case. In particular, the starting point of the factory operators and their specific requirements for such models are still unclear. This paper presents a mixed-methods study that addresses the existing research gap regarding the implementation of holistic digital factory models. The study investigates the evolving understanding of factory planning, emphasizing the transition from one-time projects to continuous tasks. The key findings reveal a significant need for cross-life-cycle information continuity, highlighting the importance of collaboration and data integration among stakeholders. The research identifies obstacles to achieving holistic digital factory planning, including knowledge management and data availability challenges. Furthermore, the applicability of existing technologies for holistic digital factory models, such as Building Information Modeling and Digital Twins, is examined, demonstrating their relevance in factory planning. Additionally, it is shown that while there is an apparent demand for standardized methods and tools, many existing methodologies are underutilized. The paper concludes with recommendations to further investigate the contrasts between literature and industry practices, as well as the implementation of shared data environments to enhance the efficiency of factory planning processes.

Production EngineeringVol. 19(6)
Autodesk (United States) (US), Drees & Sommer (Germany) (DE), Fraunhofer Project Centre Wolfsburg (DE), Hamburger Fern-Hochschule (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Casting, Composite and Processing Technology IGCV (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Phoenix Contact (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital Transformation in Industry
4.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.