A Methodological and Survival Comparison of NCDB and SEER Database for Colon Cancer Research

Despite differences in sampling techniques and follow-up reporting, NCDB and SEER demonstrated remarkable consistency in survival trends across colon cancer stages and locations. Recognizing these database-specific variations is essential for researchers conducting population-based survival analyses and selecting the most suitable registry for their studies. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD TO THE LITERATURE?: This study provides a comprehensive comparison of NCDB and SEER, highlighting how differences in sampling methodologies, follow-up reporting, and patient representation influence overall survival estimates in colon cancer. It clarifies why prior studies report conflicting survival trends and offers a methodological framework for researchers selecting the most appropriate database for their analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28141
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Methodological and Survival Comparison of NCDB and SEER Database for Colon Cancer Research

Ekin Inal, Çiğdem Benlice, Emre Görgün, Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
article

A Methodological and Survival Comparison of NCDB and SEER Database for Colon Cancer Research

Ekin Inal, Çiğdem Benlice, Emre Görgün, Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu, Metincan Erkaya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite differences in sampling techniques and follow-up reporting, NCDB and SEER demonstrated remarkable consistency in survival trends across colon cancer stages and locations. Recognizing these database-specific variations is essential for researchers conducting population-based survival analyses and selecting the most suitable registry for their studies. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD TO THE LITERATURE?: This study provides a comprehensive comparison of NCDB and SEER, highlighting how differences in sampling methodologies, follow-up reporting, and patient representation influence overall survival estimates in colon cancer. It clarifies why prior studies report conflicting survival trends and offers a methodological framework for researchers selecting the most appropriate database for their analysis.

Journal of Surgical OncologyVol. 132(1)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Ankara University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.