Understanding the Form and Timing of Damage to Archaeological Sites During the Syrian Conflict by Combining Evidence From Remote Sensing With Ground Observation

ABSTRACT Satellite remote sensing is used widely to monitor damage to archaeological sites in conflict areas, including in Syria. On‐the‐ground assessments have been fewer in number, and the degree to which remote sensing assessments reflect what is happening on the ground has not been extensively tested. Using data from 19 archaeological sites in northwest Syria, we present a case study comparing the strengths of satellite remote sensing and ground observation for assessing site condition. The temporal patterning of different types of damage is also compared to other studies and discussed in terms of a local understanding of political events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeological Prospection
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1997
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Archaeological Research and Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Form and Timing of Damage to Archaeological Sites During the Syrian Conflict by Combining Evidence From Remote Sensing With Ground Observation

William M. Deadman, Kristen Hopper, Adnan Almohamad, Daniel A. Lawrence et al.
1 citations
Archaeological Prospection
Archaeological Research and Protection
7.46
article

Understanding the Form and Timing of Damage to Archaeological Sites During the Syrian Conflict by Combining Evidence From Remote Sensing With Ground Observation

William M. Deadman, Kristen Hopper, Adnan Almohamad, Daniel A. Lawrence, Graham Philip
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Satellite remote sensing is used widely to monitor damage to archaeological sites in conflict areas, including in Syria. On‐the‐ground assessments have been fewer in number, and the degree to which remote sensing assessments reflect what is happening on the ground has not been extensively tested. Using data from 19 archaeological sites in northwest Syria, we present a case study comparing the strengths of satellite remote sensing and ground observation for assessing site condition. The temporal patterning of different types of damage is also compared to other studies and discussed in terms of a local understanding of political events.

Archaeological ProspectionVol. 32(4)
Durham University (GB), University of Lausanne (CH), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Archaeological Research and Protection
7.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding the Form and Timing of Damage to Archaeological Sites During the Syrian Conflict by Combining Evidence From Remote Sensing With Ground Observation — William M. Deadman, Kristen Hopper, et al. · Archaeological Prospection (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS