Assessment of Vegetation Indices Derived from UAV Imagery for Weed Detection in Vineyards

This study aimed to detect weeds in vineyards throughout the crop cycle using pixel-based classification of RGB imagery captured by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Five vegetation indices (NGRDI, NDVI, GLI, NDRE, and GNDVI) and three supervised classifiers (SVM, RT, and KNN) were evaluated during four flight campaigns. Classification performance was assessed using precision, recall, and F1-Score, supported by descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and 95% confidence interval), inferential tests (Shapiro–Wilk, ANOVA, and Kruskal–Wallis), and visual map inspection. Statistical analyses, both descriptive and inferential, did not indicate significant differences between classification methods. NGRDI consistently showed strong performance, especially for vine and soil classes, and effectively detected weeds, with F1-Scores above 0.78 in some campaigns, occasionally outperforming the supervised classifiers. GLI displayed variable results and a higher sensitivity to noise, whereas NDVI showed limitations when applied to RGB data, particularly in sparsely vegetated areas. Among the classifiers, the SVM achieved the highest F1-Score for vine (0.9330) and soil (0.9231), whereas KNN produced balanced results and visually coherent maps. RT showed lower accuracy and greater variability, particularly in the weed class. Despite the lack of statistically significant differences, visual analysis favored NGRDI and SVM for generating cleaner classification outputs. Study limitations include lighting variability, reduced spatial coverage owing to low flight altitude, and a lack of spatial context in pixel-based methods. Future research should explore object-based approaches and advanced classifiers (e.g., Random Forest and Convolutional Neural Networks) to enhance robustness and generalization. Overall, RGB-based indices, particularly NGRDI, are cost-effective and reliable tools for weed detection, thereby supporting scalable precision in viticulture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17111899
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Vegetation Indices Derived from UAV Imagery for Weed Detection in Vineyards

Fabrício Lopes de Macedo, Miguel Â. A. Pinheiro de Carvalho, José G. R. de Freitas, Humberto Nóbrega
5 citations
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
8.58
article

Assessment of Vegetation Indices Derived from UAV Imagery for Weed Detection in Vineyards

Fabrício Lopes de Macedo, Miguel Â. A. Pinheiro de Carvalho, José G. R. de Freitas, Humberto Nóbrega
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to detect weeds in vineyards throughout the crop cycle using pixel-based classification of RGB imagery captured by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Five vegetation indices (NGRDI, NDVI, GLI, NDRE, and GNDVI) and three supervised classifiers (SVM, RT, and KNN) were evaluated during four flight campaigns. Classification performance was assessed using precision, recall, and F1-Score, supported by descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and 95% confidence interval), inferential tests (Shapiro–Wilk, ANOVA, and Kruskal–Wallis), and visual map inspection. Statistical analyses, both descriptive and inferential, did not indicate significant differences between classification methods. NGRDI consistently showed strong performance, especially for vine and soil classes, and effectively detected weeds, with F1-Scores above 0.78 in some campaigns, occasionally outperforming the supervised classifiers. GLI displayed variable results and a higher sensitivity to noise, whereas NDVI showed limitations when applied to RGB data, particularly in sparsely vegetated areas. Among the classifiers, the SVM achieved the highest F1-Score for vine (0.9330) and soil (0.9231), whereas KNN produced balanced results and visually coherent maps. RT showed lower accuracy and greater variability, particularly in the weed class. Despite the lack of statistically significant differences, visual analysis favored NGRDI and SVM for generating cleaner classification outputs. Study limitations include lighting variability, reduced spatial coverage owing to low flight altitude, and a lack of spatial context in pixel-based methods. Future research should explore object-based approaches and advanced classifiers (e.g., Random Forest and Convolutional Neural Networks) to enhance robustness and generalization. Overall, RGB-based indices, particularly NGRDI, are cost-effective and reliable tools for weed detection, thereby supporting scalable precision in viticulture.

Remote SensingVol. 17(11)
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT), Universidade da Madeira (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
8.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.