Explaining the Variance of City Response to the <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19 Pandemic in China: A Matter of Leadership?

ABSTRACT When COVID‐19 emerged in China, local leaders reacted differently to the health threat. Some acted immediately, some waited for higher levels of authority to act. The timing of local decision‐makers mattered: quick interventions limited the damage wrought by the virus. In this paper, we ask why some local leaders acted quicker than others. We study whether the administrative experience of Chinese leaders affected the timing of initial crisis decision‐making. Drawing on extant literature, we identify three types of administrative experience that might affect the timing of crisis decisions at the local level: personal experience with previous crises, job diversity, and the presence of a local network. Our analysis demonstrates that all three factors are positively associated with the timing of early action in the face of the COVID‐19 epidemic. It appears that experienced leaders are wont to act quicker in the face of an emerging threat.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Policy Research
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70023
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining the Variance of City Response to the COVID ‐19 Pandemic in China: A Matter of Leadership?

Xinming Chen, Yihong Liu
Review of Policy Research
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
article

Explaining the Variance of City Response to the COVID ‐19 Pandemic in China: A Matter of Leadership?

Xinming Chen, Yihong Liu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT When COVID‐19 emerged in China, local leaders reacted differently to the health threat. Some acted immediately, some waited for higher levels of authority to act. The timing of local decision‐makers mattered: quick interventions limited the damage wrought by the virus. In this paper, we ask why some local leaders acted quicker than others. We study whether the administrative experience of Chinese leaders affected the timing of initial crisis decision‐making. Drawing on extant literature, we identify three types of administrative experience that might affect the timing of crisis decisions at the local level: personal experience with previous crises, job diversity, and the presence of a local network. Our analysis demonstrates that all three factors are positively associated with the timing of early action in the face of the COVID‐19 epidemic. It appears that experienced leaders are wont to act quicker in the face of an emerging threat.

Review of Policy ResearchVol. 43(1)
Renmin University of China (CN), Capital Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.