Physiological Responses and the Dust Retention Ability of Different Turfgrass Mixture Ratios Under Continuous Drought

Drought is one of the main environmental disturbances limiting the growth and production of turfgrass in China and around the world. To study the performance under drought conditions of different mixing ratios (<i>Lolium perenne</i> L., <i>Festuca elata</i> Keng., <i>Poa pratensis</i> L.), a water-controlled pot experiment was conducted. The mixing ratios used were 2:3:5, 2:6:2, and 2:2:6 for <i>Lolium perenne</i>, <i>Festuca elata</i>, and <i>Poa pratensis</i>, respectively. The relative water content (RWC), proline (Pro) content, and other physiological and ecological variables of three turfgrass monocultures and their three ratio mixtures (a total of six different treatments) were measured under drought as well as dust stress at various time points. The results revealed that, under drought stress, the dust retention performance of the mixing ratio treatments was better than the monocultures, with the best performance in the 2:6:2 mix and the worst in the <i>Poa pratensis</i> monoculture. Additionally, during the 21 days of drought stress, as time increased, the appearance quality (TQ) of the turfgrass gradually declined over time; its RWC gradually decreased; its chlorophyll (Chl) content, peroxidase (POD) activity, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity all showed a trend of initially increasing then decreasing; and its soluble sugar (Sol), malondialdehyde (MDA), and Pro content increased continuously. A comprehensive evaluation of physiological and ecological variables, using the membership function method, showed that the six types of turfgrass treatments ranked as follows (from strongest to weakest) in drought resistance: 2:6:2 mix > <i>Festuca elata</i> monoculture > 2:3:5 mix > 2:2:6 mix > <i>Lolium perenne</i> monoculture > <i>Poa pratensis</i> monoculture. The dust retention capability was assessed through quantitative measurements, and the ranking of dust retention amounts in descending order was as follows: <i>Festuca elata</i> > 2:6:2 mix > 2:2:6 mix > <i>Poa pratensis</i> > <i>Lolium perenne</i> > 2:3:5 mix. We conclude that, in practical applications, the degree of drought can be appropriately controlled within a certain range to achieve maximum dust retention benefits from turfgrass.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14111667
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physiological Responses and the Dust Retention Ability of Different Turfgrass Mixture Ratios Under Continuous Drought

B. Liu, Junrui Wang, Xiao Guo, Haimei Li et al.
3 citations
Plants
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
2.58
article

Physiological Responses and the Dust Retention Ability of Different Turfgrass Mixture Ratios Under Continuous Drought

B. Liu, Junrui Wang, Xiao Guo, Haimei Li, Xiujun Liu, Dehong Gong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Drought is one of the main environmental disturbances limiting the growth and production of turfgrass in China and around the world. To study the performance under drought conditions of different mixing ratios (<i>Lolium perenne</i> L., <i>Festuca elata</i> Keng., <i>Poa pratensis</i> L.), a water-controlled pot experiment was conducted. The mixing ratios used were 2:3:5, 2:6:2, and 2:2:6 for <i>Lolium perenne</i>, <i>Festuca elata</i>, and <i>Poa pratensis</i>, respectively. The relative water content (RWC), proline (Pro) content, and other physiological and ecological variables of three turfgrass monocultures and their three ratio mixtures (a total of six different treatments) were measured under drought as well as dust stress at various time points. The results revealed that, under drought stress, the dust retention performance of the mixing ratio treatments was better than the monocultures, with the best performance in the 2:6:2 mix and the worst in the <i>Poa pratensis</i> monoculture. Additionally, during the 21 days of drought stress, as time increased, the appearance quality (TQ) of the turfgrass gradually declined over time; its RWC gradually decreased; its chlorophyll (Chl) content, peroxidase (POD) activity, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity all showed a trend of initially increasing then decreasing; and its soluble sugar (Sol), malondialdehyde (MDA), and Pro content increased continuously. A comprehensive evaluation of physiological and ecological variables, using the membership function method, showed that the six types of turfgrass treatments ranked as follows (from strongest to weakest) in drought resistance: 2:6:2 mix > <i>Festuca elata</i> monoculture > 2:3:5 mix > 2:2:6 mix > <i>Lolium perenne</i> monoculture > <i>Poa pratensis</i> monoculture. The dust retention capability was assessed through quantitative measurements, and the ranking of dust retention amounts in descending order was as follows: <i>Festuca elata</i> > 2:6:2 mix > 2:2:6 mix > <i>Poa pratensis</i> > <i>Lolium perenne</i> > 2:3:5 mix. We conclude that, in practical applications, the degree of drought can be appropriately controlled within a certain range to achieve maximum dust retention benefits from turfgrass.

PlantsVol. 14(11)
Qingdao University (CN), Qingdao Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
2.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.