The World Health Organization’s normative authority in Member States: An Empirical Study of the Brazilian Judicial Branch

Abstract The article aims to describe how Brazilian courts adopt World Health Organization’s (WHO) normative production domestically, conducing an empirical study on how the Superior Tribunal de Justiça and the Supremo Tribunal Federal implement the WHO’s norms, both hard and soft law. To identify whether the normative authority of the WHO has been referenced in a decision, it employs a methodology that identifies direct and precise references to WHO standards. The results are presented by courts, Judges, health issues, documents and the binding nature of WHO documents. In conclusion, the article highlights the limited use of WHO normative authority by Brazilian courts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Direito e Práxis
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2025/85946
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The World Health Organization’s normative authority in Member States: An Empirical Study of the Brazilian Judicial Branch

Paula Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Marina Ribeiro Castro, Natália da Silva Barcelos
Revista Direito e Práxis
Human Rights and Development
article

The World Health Organization’s normative authority in Member States: An Empirical Study of the Brazilian Judicial Branch

Paula Wojcikiewicz Almeida, Marina Ribeiro Castro, Natália da Silva Barcelos
article en

Abstract

Abstract The article aims to describe how Brazilian courts adopt World Health Organization’s (WHO) normative production domestically, conducing an empirical study on how the Superior Tribunal de Justiça and the Supremo Tribunal Federal implement the WHO’s norms, both hard and soft law. To identify whether the normative authority of the WHO has been referenced in a decision, it employs a methodology that identifies direct and precise references to WHO standards. The results are presented by courts, Judges, health issues, documents and the binding nature of WHO documents. In conclusion, the article highlights the limited use of WHO normative authority by Brazilian courts.

Revista Direito e PráxisVol. 16(3)
Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Human Rights and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.