The Concept of Breakthrough Innovations in the Scientific Discourse of Economic Science

The aim of the article is to define the essence of breakthrough innovations and to differentiate, on this basis, related but distinct concepts in the field of technological development. The research methods included scientific abstraction to determine the essence of the category «breakthrough innovations»; the grouping method to establish the belonging of breakthrough and disruptive innovations to certain classifications, both general and specific methods, when identifying differences between related categories in the innovation sphere. Based on the analysis of theoretical and methodological approaches to defining innovations that cause social transformations, a coexistence in economic science of several categories reflecting the essence of the same phenomenon has been identified. The presence of terminological confusion in scientific publications has been clarified, manifesting in the use of terms such as «breakthrough», «disruptive», and «destructive» innovations by researchers to describe the same phenomenon or process. Based on the characteristics of breakthrough innovations as those that fundamentally change society, they have been classified as a type of radical innovation. Choosing the radical nature of innovations as the criterion for defining them as breakthrough, a distinction has been made between other types of technological innovations. It is determined that, unlike breakthrough innovations, disruptive innovations are not related to revolutionary changes. They do not transform the technological foundation and the organization of production, but are the improving ones. They ensure a better balance between costs and efficiency, help create new markets or form market niches, and also modify existing business models. To describe innovations that are radical in nature, manifesting at the macroeconomic level of economic development and possessing the ability to cause societal transformations, it is recommended to use the term «breakthrough innovations». In the case of improving innovations, which are microeconomic in nature, related to products, markets, and business models, it is worth operating with the concept of «disruptive innovations».

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Business Inform
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-3-13-22
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Concept of Breakthrough Innovations in the Scientific Discourse of Economic Science

Hanna Pylypenko, Oleksandr Ye. Rzhavin
Business Inform
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
article

The Concept of Breakthrough Innovations in the Scientific Discourse of Economic Science

Hanna Pylypenko, Oleksandr Ye. Rzhavin
article en

Abstract

The aim of the article is to define the essence of breakthrough innovations and to differentiate, on this basis, related but distinct concepts in the field of technological development. The research methods included scientific abstraction to determine the essence of the category «breakthrough innovations»; the grouping method to establish the belonging of breakthrough and disruptive innovations to certain classifications, both general and specific methods, when identifying differences between related categories in the innovation sphere. Based on the analysis of theoretical and methodological approaches to defining innovations that cause social transformations, a coexistence in economic science of several categories reflecting the essence of the same phenomenon has been identified. The presence of terminological confusion in scientific publications has been clarified, manifesting in the use of terms such as «breakthrough», «disruptive», and «destructive» innovations by researchers to describe the same phenomenon or process. Based on the characteristics of breakthrough innovations as those that fundamentally change society, they have been classified as a type of radical innovation. Choosing the radical nature of innovations as the criterion for defining them as breakthrough, a distinction has been made between other types of technological innovations. It is determined that, unlike breakthrough innovations, disruptive innovations are not related to revolutionary changes. They do not transform the technological foundation and the organization of production, but are the improving ones. They ensure a better balance between costs and efficiency, help create new markets or form market niches, and also modify existing business models. To describe innovations that are radical in nature, manifesting at the macroeconomic level of economic development and possessing the ability to cause societal transformations, it is recommended to use the term «breakthrough innovations». In the case of improving innovations, which are microeconomic in nature, related to products, markets, and business models, it is worth operating with the concept of «disruptive innovations».

Business InformVol. 3(566)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Concept of Breakthrough Innovations in the Scientific Discourse of Economic Science — Hanna Pylypenko, Oleksandr Ye. Rzhavin · Business Inform (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS