Sharp Variance Estimator and Causal Bootstrap in Stratified Randomized Experiments
Randomized experiments are the gold standard for estimating treatment effects, and randomization serves as a reasoned basis for inference. In widely used stratified randomized experiments, randomization-based finite-population asymptotic theory enables valid inference for the average treatment effect, relying on normal approximation and a Neyman-type conservative variance estimator. However, when the sample size is small or the outcomes are skewed, the Neyman-type variance estimator may become overly conservative, and the normal approximation can fail. To address these issues, we propose a sharp variance estimator and two causal bootstrap methods to more accurately approximate the sampling distribution of the weighted difference-in-means estimator in stratified randomized experiments. The first causal bootstrap procedure is based on rank-preserving imputation, and we prove its second-order refinement over normal approximation. The second causal bootstrap procedure is based on constant-treatment-effect imputation and is further applicable in paired experiments. In contrast to traditional bootstrap methods, where randomness originates from hypothetical super-population sampling, our analysis for the proposed causal bootstrap is randomization-based, relying solely on the randomness of treatment assignment in randomized experiments. Numerical studies and two real data applications demonstrate the advantages of our proposed methods in finite samples. The R package CausalBootstrap implementing our method is publicly available.
Authors
- K. Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8778-0086)
- Hanzhong Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0028-5136)
- Haoyang Yu
Institutions
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Statistics in Medicine
- Published
- 2025-05-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70139
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.63
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation