Carbon-Negative Production of Soda Ash: Process Development and Feasibility Evaluation

Aiming to produce carbon-negative soda ash, chlor-alkali electrolysis, CO<sub>2</sub> direct air capture, and sodium carbonate crystallization are combined in a so-called CODA process. In this study, four variants of the CODA process are developed and evaluated by means of modeling and simulation. Variations of the process design are related with the CO<sub>2</sub> absorption technology, the crystallization strategy, and the possible byproducts of the process. The processes using a cross-flow packed absorber had a smaller CAPEX (between 195 and 209 USD/ton soda) than the process using a droplet absorber (337 USD/ton soda). When coupled with the cross-flow packed absorber, the two-step crystallization strategy had a smaller OPEX (150 USD/ton soda) than the one-step crystallization (175 USD/ton soda). The revenue of selling the process byproducts such as hydrogen, chlorine, and CO<sub>2</sub> certificates was key to the profitability of the CODA process. The most promising CODA variant (cross-flow packed absorber and two-step crystallization) consumes about 0.15 tons of CO<sub>2</sub> from the air and earned nearly 200 USD/ton soda ash, making CODA an attractive alternative that deserves to be scaled-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00483
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon-Negative Production of Soda Ash: Process Development and Feasibility Evaluation

Heike Lorenz, Peter Schulze, Maria F. Gutierrez
5 citations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Extraction and Separation Processes
3.57
article

Carbon-Negative Production of Soda Ash: Process Development and Feasibility Evaluation

Heike Lorenz, Peter Schulze, Maria F. Gutierrez
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Aiming to produce carbon-negative soda ash, chlor-alkali electrolysis, CO<sub>2</sub> direct air capture, and sodium carbonate crystallization are combined in a so-called CODA process. In this study, four variants of the CODA process are developed and evaluated by means of modeling and simulation. Variations of the process design are related with the CO<sub>2</sub> absorption technology, the crystallization strategy, and the possible byproducts of the process. The processes using a cross-flow packed absorber had a smaller CAPEX (between 195 and 209 USD/ton soda) than the process using a droplet absorber (337 USD/ton soda). When coupled with the cross-flow packed absorber, the two-step crystallization strategy had a smaller OPEX (150 USD/ton soda) than the one-step crystallization (175 USD/ton soda). The revenue of selling the process byproducts such as hydrogen, chlorine, and CO<sub>2</sub> certificates was key to the profitability of the CODA process. The most promising CODA variant (cross-flow packed absorber and two-step crystallization) consumes about 0.15 tons of CO<sub>2</sub> from the air and earned nearly 200 USD/ton soda ash, making CODA an attractive alternative that deserves to be scaled-up.

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchVol. 64(23)
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Extraction and Separation Processes
3.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Carbon-Negative Production of Soda Ash: Process Development and Feasibility Evaluation — Heike Lorenz, Peter Schulze, et al. · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS