Couple-Based Carrier Screening: How Gene and Variant Considerations Impact Outcomes

<i>Background/Objectives</i>: The clinical utility of reproductive carrier screening varies based on the genes tested, variant reporting policies, and the screened patient population. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of carrier screening among reproductive couples undergoing testing in a routine clinical setting. <i>Methods</i>: A total of 1595 couples, primarily referred by reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists, underwent couple-based carrier screening across 390 genes. Carrier states were assessed on a couple basis and reported only if a couple were at risk of having affected offspring. At-risk conditions were classified by severity, as well as their likelihood of clinical impact based on the specific variants detected in each at-risk couple. Secondary findings with potential personal utility were also evaluated. <i>Results</i>: Among the screened couples, 4.2% were at risk of having a child with a genetic condition. When limited to high-clinical-impact results, the at-risk couple rate decreased to 1.0%, with 44% of these cases involving <i>CFTR</i>, <i>SMN1</i>, or <i>FMR1</i>. Secondary findings were identified in 1.7% of individuals. <i>Conclusions</i>: Carrier screening for only <i>CFTR</i>, <i>SMN1</i>, and <i>FMR1</i> will miss more than half of at-risk couples, underscoring the importance of broader carrier screening. Specific variants and their combinations can influence the predicted clinical impact of at-risk conditions, marking a key advantage of couple-based reporting. Secondary findings were common, highlighting the importance of discussing these potential findings during pre-test counselling.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Genes
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16060671
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Couple-Based Carrier Screening: How Gene and Variant Considerations Impact Outcomes

Eric Lee, Vivek Nair, Edward Kwan, Trang T. Le et al.
1 citations
Genes
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
1.52
article

Couple-Based Carrier Screening: How Gene and Variant Considerations Impact Outcomes

Eric Lee, Vivek Nair, Edward Kwan, Trang T. Le, Ranad Shaheen, Simon T. Cliffe, Kaylee Orton, Claire Faga
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background/Objectives</i>: The clinical utility of reproductive carrier screening varies based on the genes tested, variant reporting policies, and the screened patient population. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of carrier screening among reproductive couples undergoing testing in a routine clinical setting. <i>Methods</i>: A total of 1595 couples, primarily referred by reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists, underwent couple-based carrier screening across 390 genes. Carrier states were assessed on a couple basis and reported only if a couple were at risk of having affected offspring. At-risk conditions were classified by severity, as well as their likelihood of clinical impact based on the specific variants detected in each at-risk couple. Secondary findings with potential personal utility were also evaluated. <i>Results</i>: Among the screened couples, 4.2% were at risk of having a child with a genetic condition. When limited to high-clinical-impact results, the at-risk couple rate decreased to 1.0%, with 44% of these cases involving <i>CFTR</i>, <i>SMN1</i>, or <i>FMR1</i>. Secondary findings were identified in 1.7% of individuals. <i>Conclusions</i>: Carrier screening for only <i>CFTR</i>, <i>SMN1</i>, and <i>FMR1</i> will miss more than half of at-risk couples, underscoring the importance of broader carrier screening. Specific variants and their combinations can influence the predicted clinical impact of at-risk conditions, marking a key advantage of couple-based reporting. Secondary findings were common, highlighting the importance of discussing these potential findings during pre-test counselling.

GenesVol. 16(6)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.