Legal Responsibility of Marketplaces for Consumer Losses Due to Counterfeit Products: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Singapore

The rapid development of e-commerce in Southeast Asia, particularly in Indonesia and Singapore, has opened up new economic opportunities, but it has also raised serious concerns regarding the circulation of counterfeit products on digital marketplace platforms. Counterfeit products not only harm the original manufacturer economically, but also endanger consumers in terms of health and safety. This research aims to evaluate and compare the legal responsibility of marketplaces for consumer losses due to counterfeit products based on regulations in Indonesia and Singapore. The method employed was a normative, juridical, and macro-comparative approach, involving the analysis of laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and interviews with stakeholders in the consumer protection sector. The results indicate that Indonesia lacks a robust legal framework for holding marketplaces accountable, which hinders consumers' access to effective legal protection. In contrast, Singapore has developed a progressive legal system through the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act, which requires marketplaces to apply the precautionary principle and provide efficient dispute resolution mechanisms. The findings confirm that marketplaces should be positioned as active business actors who can be held legally liable when harm occurs to consumers due to the sale of counterfeit products. This research recommends revisions to Indonesia's Consumer Protection Law and Government Regulation No. 80/2019 to align with the development of modern e-commerce practices, including the implementation of digital product certification and reverse proof to ensure fairness for consumers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Service and Research
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v5i5.1228
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Responsibility of Marketplaces for Consumer Losses Due to Counterfeit Products: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Singapore

Agus Dimyati, Alip Rahman, Ikmal Ramdhan Purnama, Akmal Ramdhan Purnama et al.
International Journal of Social Service and Research
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Legal Responsibility of Marketplaces for Consumer Losses Due to Counterfeit Products: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Singapore

Agus Dimyati, Alip Rahman, Ikmal Ramdhan Purnama, Akmal Ramdhan Purnama, Reza Hardiansyah
article en

Abstract

The rapid development of e-commerce in Southeast Asia, particularly in Indonesia and Singapore, has opened up new economic opportunities, but it has also raised serious concerns regarding the circulation of counterfeit products on digital marketplace platforms. Counterfeit products not only harm the original manufacturer economically, but also endanger consumers in terms of health and safety. This research aims to evaluate and compare the legal responsibility of marketplaces for consumer losses due to counterfeit products based on regulations in Indonesia and Singapore. The method employed was a normative, juridical, and macro-comparative approach, involving the analysis of laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and interviews with stakeholders in the consumer protection sector. The results indicate that Indonesia lacks a robust legal framework for holding marketplaces accountable, which hinders consumers' access to effective legal protection. In contrast, Singapore has developed a progressive legal system through the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act, which requires marketplaces to apply the precautionary principle and provide efficient dispute resolution mechanisms. The findings confirm that marketplaces should be positioned as active business actors who can be held legally liable when harm occurs to consumers due to the sale of counterfeit products. This research recommends revisions to Indonesia's Consumer Protection Law and Government Regulation No. 80/2019 to align with the development of modern e-commerce practices, including the implementation of digital product certification and reverse proof to ensure fairness for consumers.

International Journal of Social Service and ResearchVol. 5(5)
Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.