Measuring the natural capital of Amazonian forests: A case study of the National Forest of Carajás, Brazil

• Using ecosystem functions and ecosystem services metrics provided a deeper comprehension of natural capital. • Amazon biodiversity and the benefits provided by it to human welfare are clearly linked to natural capital. • Understanding the value of forest can improve the effectiveness of conservation policy and decision-making. We propose an innovative approach that links nature and people to assess the natural capital of tropical forests in the Amazon. Our study location is a protected area inside Eastern Amazon forest, where we defined 14 sampling points and analyzed ten components, which encompass the maintenance of standing forests (nature to itself) and the provision of ecosystem services (nature to people). Five components were used to assess ecosystem functions and five components were used to assess ecosystem services. As for ecosystem functions, we registered 467 species of animals (122 bees, 53 butterflies, 292 birds) and 418 plant species, and a mean interaction diversity of 2.8 (from 480 bee-plant interactions). Based on functional traits, we found that at least 83 % of species must be preserved to guarantee resilience, and that functional diversity relies on 60 % of non-replaceable species. Eleven per cent of birds and 9 % of plants are endangered. As for ecosystem services, carbon storage in soil and vegetation is 41.6 and 173 MgC/ha (on average), respectively. One to four uses by Amazonian traditional communities were reported on 42 % of plants. In the vicinities of the protected area, we found that 66 % of crops (13 from 20 crop species) depend on pollinating bees, and the value of annual crop pollination service is US$4.5Mi. Regarding water protection and local climate regulation, data modelling has shown that the presence of protected forests leads to a 21 % increase in evapotranspiration and a decrease in temperature of 0.4 °C. Our framework showed a clear link between the megadiversity found in Amazonian tropical forest and the robust benefits provided to human welfare, highlighting forest conservation as a key element for sustainable development. Advances in understanding the value of forests stimulate significant new opportunities to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of forest conservation and management policies and decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystem Services
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101734
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the natural capital of Amazonian forests: A case study of the National Forest of Carajás, Brazil

Amanda Paracampo, J.E.P. Santos, Sâmia Nunes, Orlando Tobias Silveira et al.
4 citations
Ecosystem Services
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
4.42
article

Measuring the natural capital of Amazonian forests: A case study of the National Forest of Carajás, Brazil

Amanda Paracampo, J.E.P. Santos, Sâmia Nunes, Orlando Tobias Silveira, Markus Gastauer, Tereza Cristina Giannini, Jacobus C. Biesmeijer, Ulysses Madureira Maia, Rafael Borges da Silva Valadares, Rogleson Albuquerque Brito, Guilherme Oliveira, Rosane Barbosa Lopes Cavalcante, Sidnei de Melo Dantas, Rafael Cabral Borges, Pedro Lage Viana, Sílvio Júnio Ramos, Renata Gonçalves Tedeschi, José Augusto Pires Bitencourt, Paulo Rógenes Monteiro Pontes, Leonardo Miranda, Vitor H. F. Gomes, Felipe Martello, Claudia Priscila Wanzeler da Costa
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Using ecosystem functions and ecosystem services metrics provided a deeper comprehension of natural capital. • Amazon biodiversity and the benefits provided by it to human welfare are clearly linked to natural capital. • Understanding the value of forest can improve the effectiveness of conservation policy and decision-making. We propose an innovative approach that links nature and people to assess the natural capital of tropical forests in the Amazon. Our study location is a protected area inside Eastern Amazon forest, where we defined 14 sampling points and analyzed ten components, which encompass the maintenance of standing forests (nature to itself) and the provision of ecosystem services (nature to people). Five components were used to assess ecosystem functions and five components were used to assess ecosystem services. As for ecosystem functions, we registered 467 species of animals (122 bees, 53 butterflies, 292 birds) and 418 plant species, and a mean interaction diversity of 2.8 (from 480 bee-plant interactions). Based on functional traits, we found that at least 83 % of species must be preserved to guarantee resilience, and that functional diversity relies on 60 % of non-replaceable species. Eleven per cent of birds and 9 % of plants are endangered. As for ecosystem services, carbon storage in soil and vegetation is 41.6 and 173 MgC/ha (on average), respectively. One to four uses by Amazonian traditional communities were reported on 42 % of plants. In the vicinities of the protected area, we found that 66 % of crops (13 from 20 crop species) depend on pollinating bees, and the value of annual crop pollination service is US$4.5Mi. Regarding water protection and local climate regulation, data modelling has shown that the presence of protected forests leads to a 21 % increase in evapotranspiration and a decrease in temperature of 0.4 °C. Our framework showed a clear link between the megadiversity found in Amazonian tropical forest and the robust benefits provided to human welfare, highlighting forest conservation as a key element for sustainable development. Advances in understanding the value of forests stimulate significant new opportunities to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of forest conservation and management policies and decision-making.

Ecosystem ServicesVol. 74
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (BR), Universidade de Brasília (BR), University of Oxford (GB), Vale Technological Institute (BR), Universidade Federal do Pará (BR), Lancaster University (GB)
Instituto Tecnológico Vale
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.