Erosive Wear of Stainless Steel-Based Hardfacings with Ex-Situ and In-Situ Synthesized TiC

The resistance to erosion of stainless steel-based plasma transferred arc (PTA)-cladded hardfacings reinforced with ex-situ-synthesized TiC is compared to those reinforced using in-situ-synthesized TiC (formed from TiO2 and graphite). The PTA cladding was performed under an optimized torch linear velocity of 0.7 m/s and cladding current of 115 A. The microstructure of the cladded overlay was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the phase composition was determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD). Vickers macrohardness measurements were made at representative areas at the surface of the overlays. An erosive wear test was conducted with impact angles of 30° and 90° and impact velocities of 20, 50, and 80 m/s. The formation of TiC from TiO2 and graphite started during ball milling and ended during the cladding stage. The final TiC content in the hardfacings was below nominal, which is likely due to carbide segregation occurring during the cladding process. The highest hardness was 2.4 times that of stainless steel, which was observed in the deposit containing 60 vol.% ex-situ-synthesized TiC. Both ex-situ and in-situ TiC reinforcement improved resistance to erosion, providing up to 1.5 times better resistance under the 30° impact angle and up to 6.3 times under the 90° impact angle than that of stainless steel. However, ex-situ TiC showed a slightly larger improvement. At the 30° impact angle, the primary wear mechanism is micro-ploughing, but at the 90° impact angle it is surface fatigue. Both mechanisms appeared at both angles under 80 m/s impact velocity.