Gone in a Splash? Temporal Dynamics of Flukeprint Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> (<scp>eDNA</scp>) Detection for Common Coastal Northeast Pacific Cetacean Species

ABSTRACT Environmental DNA (eDNA) analytical techniques have been developed and applied to a small subset of cetacean species worldwide. Direct or “flukeprint” eDNA sampling has previously been proven as an effective approach for detecting DNA from target cetacean species including harbor porpoises ( Phocoena phocoena ), humpback whales ( Megaptera novaeangliae ), and killer whales ( Orcinus orca ). These common species are under increasing pressure from coastal anthropogenic activities throughout their respective Northeast Pacific ranges, and there is an increasing urgency to employ less invasive tools to address data gaps to inform conservation measures. However, it is unclear how long DNA shed in flukeprints persists for each of these species in the dynamic ocean environment. In this study, we opportunistically collected seawater (2–3 L) from flukeprints when individual harbor porpoise ( n = 3), humpback whales ( n = 3), and killer whales ( n = 3) were observed diving. We collected samples across a series of five time points after each flukeprint was first observed: 30 s, 1 min 30 s, 2 min, 5 min 30 s, and 10 min 30 s. A total of 45 samples were collected across three species and analyzed with previously published species‐specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays to assess the persistence of eDNA over time. We found a variation in the detectability across the five time points between both target species and individuals sampled, with a general trend consisting of reduced eDNA detectability over time. These findings yield insights into the temporal dynamics of cetacean eDNA in marine environments, demonstrating the importance of species‐ and context‐specific considerations when designing effective monitoring strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental DNA
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70132
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gone in a Splash? Temporal Dynamics of Flukeprint Environmental DNA (eDNA) Detection for Common Coastal Northeast Pacific Cetacean Species

Karina Dracott, Emma Laqua, Gary J. Sutton, Chloe V. Robinson et al.
4 citations
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
article

Gone in a Splash? Temporal Dynamics of Flukeprint Environmental DNA (eDNA) Detection for Common Coastal Northeast Pacific Cetacean Species

Karina Dracott, Emma Laqua, Gary J. Sutton, Chloe V. Robinson, Amy Migneault, Ashley Bachert
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Environmental DNA (eDNA) analytical techniques have been developed and applied to a small subset of cetacean species worldwide. Direct or “flukeprint” eDNA sampling has previously been proven as an effective approach for detecting DNA from target cetacean species including harbor porpoises ( Phocoena phocoena ), humpback whales ( Megaptera novaeangliae ), and killer whales ( Orcinus orca ). These common species are under increasing pressure from coastal anthropogenic activities throughout their respective Northeast Pacific ranges, and there is an increasing urgency to employ less invasive tools to address data gaps to inform conservation measures. However, it is unclear how long DNA shed in flukeprints persists for each of these species in the dynamic ocean environment. In this study, we opportunistically collected seawater (2–3 L) from flukeprints when individual harbor porpoise ( n = 3), humpback whales ( n = 3), and killer whales ( n = 3) were observed diving. We collected samples across a series of five time points after each flukeprint was first observed: 30 s, 1 min 30 s, 2 min, 5 min 30 s, and 10 min 30 s. A total of 45 samples were collected across three species and analyzed with previously published species‐specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays to assess the persistence of eDNA over time. We found a variation in the detectability across the five time points between both target species and individuals sampled, with a general trend consisting of reduced eDNA detectability over time. These findings yield insights into the temporal dynamics of cetacean eDNA in marine environments, demonstrating the importance of species‐ and context‐specific considerations when designing effective monitoring strategies.

Environmental DNAVol. 7(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.