Defining neuronal responses to the neurotropic parasite <i>Toxoplasma gondii</i>

A select group of pathogens infects neurons in the brain. Prior dogma held that neurons were "defenseless" against infecting microbes, but many studies suggest that neurons can mount anti-microbial defenses. However, a knowledge gap in understanding how neurons respond <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> to different classes of microorganisms remains. To address this gap, we compared a transcriptional data set derived from primary neuron cultures (PNCs) infected with the neurotropic intracellular parasite <i>Toxoplasma gondii</i> with a data set derived from neurons injected with <i>T. gondii</i> protein <i>in vivo</i>. These curated responses were then compared to the transcriptional responses of PNCs infected with the single-stranded RNA viruses, West Nile virus or Zika virus. These analyses highlighted a conserved response to infection associated with chemokines (<i>Cxcl10, Ccl2</i>) and cytokines (interferon signaling). However, <i>T. gondii</i> had diminished IFN-α signaling <i>in vitro</i> compared to the viral data sets and was uniquely associated with a decrease in neuron-specific genes (<i>Snap25</i>, <i>Slc17a7</i>, <i>Prkcg</i>). These data underscore that neurons participate in infection-induced neuroinflammation and illustrate that neurons possess both pathogen-specific and pathogen-conserved responses.IMPORTANCEThough neurons are commonly the target of pathogens that infect the central nervous system (CNS), few data sets assess the neuronal response to infection. This paucity of data is likely because neurons are perceived to have diminished immune capabilities. However, to understand the role of neurons in neuroinflammation and their immune capabilities, their responses must be investigated. Here, we analyzed publicly accessible, neuron-specific data sets to compare neuron responses to a eukaryotic pathogen vs two Orthoflaviviruses. A better understanding of neuron responses to different infections will allow us to develop methods for inhibiting pathways that lead to neuron dysfunction, enhancing those that limit pathogen survival, and mitigating infection-induced damage to the CNS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
mSphere
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00216-25
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining neuronal responses to the neurotropic parasite Toxoplasma gondii

Hannah J. Johnson, Sambamurthy Chandrasekaran, Christopher A. Hunter, Joshua A. Kochanowsky et al.
1 citations
mSphere
Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
2.05
article

Defining neuronal responses to the neurotropic parasite Toxoplasma gondii

Hannah J. Johnson, Sambamurthy Chandrasekaran, Christopher A. Hunter, Joshua A. Kochanowsky, Anita A. Koshy, Daniel P. Beiting
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A select group of pathogens infects neurons in the brain. Prior dogma held that neurons were "defenseless" against infecting microbes, but many studies suggest that neurons can mount anti-microbial defenses. However, a knowledge gap in understanding how neurons respond <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> to different classes of microorganisms remains. To address this gap, we compared a transcriptional data set derived from primary neuron cultures (PNCs) infected with the neurotropic intracellular parasite <i>Toxoplasma gondii</i> with a data set derived from neurons injected with <i>T. gondii</i> protein <i>in vivo</i>. These curated responses were then compared to the transcriptional responses of PNCs infected with the single-stranded RNA viruses, West Nile virus or Zika virus. These analyses highlighted a conserved response to infection associated with chemokines (<i>Cxcl10, Ccl2</i>) and cytokines (interferon signaling). However, <i>T. gondii</i> had diminished IFN-α signaling <i>in vitro</i> compared to the viral data sets and was uniquely associated with a decrease in neuron-specific genes (<i>Snap25</i>, <i>Slc17a7</i>, <i>Prkcg</i>). These data underscore that neurons participate in infection-induced neuroinflammation and illustrate that neurons possess both pathogen-specific and pathogen-conserved responses.IMPORTANCEThough neurons are commonly the target of pathogens that infect the central nervous system (CNS), few data sets assess the neuronal response to infection. This paucity of data is likely because neurons are perceived to have diminished immune capabilities. However, to understand the role of neurons in neuroinflammation and their immune capabilities, their responses must be investigated. Here, we analyzed publicly accessible, neuron-specific data sets to compare neuron responses to a eukaryotic pathogen vs two Orthoflaviviruses. A better understanding of neuron responses to different infections will allow us to develop methods for inhibiting pathways that lead to neuron dysfunction, enhancing those that limit pathogen survival, and mitigating infection-induced damage to the CNS.

mSphereVol. 10(6)
University of Arizona (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.