Trends in Testing for SARS‐CoV‐2 Among Healthcare Workers in a Canadian Cohort Study During the COVID‐19 Pandemic, June 2020 to November 2023

<b>Background:</b> While testing healthcare workers (HCWs) for SARS-CoV-2 is important to reduce transmission within healthcare settings, understanding the self-reported patterns of testing is important for interpreting vaccine effectiveness and other COVID-19-related information. <b>Objective:</b> Using longitudinal data from the COVID-19 cohort study, this study described trends in SARS-CoV-2 testing among Canadian HCWs between June 2020 and November 2023. <b>Methods:</b> HCWs completed an illness report for each instance of SARS-CoV-2 testing and episodes of symptoms compatible with COVID-19 even if untested. Overall rates of testing among the participating cohort were calculated. Rates were stratified by province, reason for testing and COVID-19 vaccination status using 4-week intervals to smooth estimates. For episodes of symptomatic illness (only), the median time between symptom onset and first test was calculated, along with the percent of episodes initially receiving a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 that were reported as being retested. <b>Results:</b> Rates of testing for SARS-CoV-2 generally mirrored rates of hospitalisation for COVID-19 among Canadians. Rates of testing were highest during the Omicron BA.1 wave (11.9 participants tested at least once per 1000 person-days) and varied by province; vaccination status did not impact rates. The most common reason for testing was for symptoms. Testing for known exposure or routine reasons greatly decreased after the Omicron BA.1 wave. In participants who were tested for episodes of symptomatic illness, the median time between symptom onset and first test was 1 day (interquartile range 0-2). Reported retesting after an initial negative result remained low throughout the study period. <b>Conclusions:</b> Understanding testing behaviours is important for public health decision-making including the analysis and interpretation of case data and vaccine effectiveness studies. It can also highlight possible missed case-finding opportunities in healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/cjid/1858884
Citations
2
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends in Testing for SARS‐CoV‐2 Among Healthcare Workers in a Canadian Cohort Study During the COVID‐19 Pandemic, June 2020 to November 2023

Curtis Cooper, Brenda L. Coleman, Jeff Powis, Robyn Harrison et al.
2 citations
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
2.79
article

Trends in Testing for SARS‐CoV‐2 Among Healthcare Workers in a Canadian Cohort Study During the COVID‐19 Pandemic, June 2020 to November 2023

Curtis Cooper, Brenda L. Coleman, Jeff Powis, Robyn Harrison, N Robertson, Marek Smieja, Jeya Nadarajah
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> While testing healthcare workers (HCWs) for SARS-CoV-2 is important to reduce transmission within healthcare settings, understanding the self-reported patterns of testing is important for interpreting vaccine effectiveness and other COVID-19-related information. <b>Objective:</b> Using longitudinal data from the COVID-19 cohort study, this study described trends in SARS-CoV-2 testing among Canadian HCWs between June 2020 and November 2023. <b>Methods:</b> HCWs completed an illness report for each instance of SARS-CoV-2 testing and episodes of symptoms compatible with COVID-19 even if untested. Overall rates of testing among the participating cohort were calculated. Rates were stratified by province, reason for testing and COVID-19 vaccination status using 4-week intervals to smooth estimates. For episodes of symptomatic illness (only), the median time between symptom onset and first test was calculated, along with the percent of episodes initially receiving a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 that were reported as being retested. <b>Results:</b> Rates of testing for SARS-CoV-2 generally mirrored rates of hospitalisation for COVID-19 among Canadians. Rates of testing were highest during the Omicron BA.1 wave (11.9 participants tested at least once per 1000 person-days) and varied by province; vaccination status did not impact rates. The most common reason for testing was for symptoms. Testing for known exposure or routine reasons greatly decreased after the Omicron BA.1 wave. In participants who were tested for episodes of symptomatic illness, the median time between symptom onset and first test was 1 day (interquartile range 0-2). Reported retesting after an initial negative result remained low throughout the study period. <b>Conclusions:</b> Understanding testing behaviours is important for public health decision-making including the analysis and interpretation of case data and vaccine effectiveness studies. It can also highlight possible missed case-finding opportunities in healthcare settings.

Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical MicrobiologyVol. 2025(1)
University of Ottawa (CA), University of Alberta (CA), Toronto Public Health (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Toronto East General Hospital (CA), Valley Health System (US), Sinai Health System (CA), St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA), Ottawa University (US)
Weston Family Foundation, Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.