Assessing the Physiochemical Parameters and Reduction Efficiency from Two Typical Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Vhembe District in South Africa

The primary sources of widespread pollution in most river catchments are improperly treated final effluents from various wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), affecting the physicochemical characteristics of the receiving water bodies. Wastewater discharge must be monitored regularly to ensure compliance with national and municipal water quality regulatory/standard restrictions. This study monitored the physicochemical parameters of two typical WWTPs (WWTP A = a peri-urban plant and WWTP B = a rural plant) for 5 months. The physicochemical parameters that were assessed included pH, temperature, total dissolved solids (TDSs), turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), alkalinity, dissolved oxygen (DO), free chlorine, chloride, sulphate, phosphate, ammonium, and electrical conductivity (EC). The evaluation yielded the following results: temperature (14 to 21 °C and 14 to 23 °C), pH (7.2-8.2 and 7.3-8.4), EC (90-800 μs/cm and 80-750 μs/cm), TDSs (65-440 and 55-410 mg/L), alkalinity (2.6-20.9 mg/L), nitrate (0.24-26.5 mg/L), nitrite (0.01-90 mg/L), phosphate (0.0-18.0 mg/L and 0.0-21 mg/L), ammonia (0.2-75 mg/L and 0.8-70 mg/L), sulphate (0.0-18.0 mg/L and 0.0-21 mg/L), chloride (5.0-22.0 mg/L and 2.0-25 mg/L), COD (6.0-710 mg/L and 7.0-800 mg/L), and turbidity (0.4-150 NTU and 1.8-130 NTU) for wastewater treatment A and B, respectively. The results also showed that temperature, pH, TDSs, nitrite/nitrate, chloride, turbidity, alkalinity, sulphate, and free chlorine were among the parameters in the final effluent discharged that met the set guidelines. In contrast, parameters such as COD, EC, phosphate, and ammonia did not meet the guideline values for most of the sampling period for both WWTPs. Furthermore, this study found that WWTPs reduced nitrate, sulphate, phosphate, and COD pollutants by more than 90% while maintaining 60% alkalinity. Temperature, pH, TDSs, EC, Cl<sup>-</sup>, and other parameters were less than 40% for WWTP A and roughly less than 50% for WWTP B.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060856
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Physiochemical Parameters and Reduction Efficiency from Two Typical Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Vhembe District in South Africa

Natasha Potgieter, Afsatou Ndama Traoré, Mpumelelo Casper Rikhotso, Leonard Owino Kachienga et al.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
article

Assessing the Physiochemical Parameters and Reduction Efficiency from Two Typical Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Vhembe District in South Africa

Natasha Potgieter, Afsatou Ndama Traoré, Mpumelelo Casper Rikhotso, Leonard Owino Kachienga, Thendo Ndou
article en

Abstract

The primary sources of widespread pollution in most river catchments are improperly treated final effluents from various wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), affecting the physicochemical characteristics of the receiving water bodies. Wastewater discharge must be monitored regularly to ensure compliance with national and municipal water quality regulatory/standard restrictions. This study monitored the physicochemical parameters of two typical WWTPs (WWTP A = a peri-urban plant and WWTP B = a rural plant) for 5 months. The physicochemical parameters that were assessed included pH, temperature, total dissolved solids (TDSs), turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), alkalinity, dissolved oxygen (DO), free chlorine, chloride, sulphate, phosphate, ammonium, and electrical conductivity (EC). The evaluation yielded the following results: temperature (14 to 21 °C and 14 to 23 °C), pH (7.2-8.2 and 7.3-8.4), EC (90-800 μs/cm and 80-750 μs/cm), TDSs (65-440 and 55-410 mg/L), alkalinity (2.6-20.9 mg/L), nitrate (0.24-26.5 mg/L), nitrite (0.01-90 mg/L), phosphate (0.0-18.0 mg/L and 0.0-21 mg/L), ammonia (0.2-75 mg/L and 0.8-70 mg/L), sulphate (0.0-18.0 mg/L and 0.0-21 mg/L), chloride (5.0-22.0 mg/L and 2.0-25 mg/L), COD (6.0-710 mg/L and 7.0-800 mg/L), and turbidity (0.4-150 NTU and 1.8-130 NTU) for wastewater treatment A and B, respectively. The results also showed that temperature, pH, TDSs, nitrite/nitrate, chloride, turbidity, alkalinity, sulphate, and free chlorine were among the parameters in the final effluent discharged that met the set guidelines. In contrast, parameters such as COD, EC, phosphate, and ammonia did not meet the guideline values for most of the sampling period for both WWTPs. Furthermore, this study found that WWTPs reduced nitrate, sulphate, phosphate, and COD pollutants by more than 90% while maintaining 60% alkalinity. Temperature, pH, TDSs, EC, Cl<sup>-</sup>, and other parameters were less than 40% for WWTP A and roughly less than 50% for WWTP B.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 22(6)
University of Venda (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.