Priorities for Healthcare Systems Emergency Preparedness in Inpatient Settings Informed by COVID-19: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report

This workshop identified a set of core system-level care delivery priorities that emerged during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic to assist global healthcare systems to respond to future similar emergencies using an informed and systematic approach. Led by a working group (<i>n</i> = 14) of nurses and physicians with diverse clinical and administrative backgrounds, we conducted a literature review of staffing, supplies, and systems in hospital inpatient settings to inform potential candidate priorities of COVID-19 care delivery challenges. We then used a modified Delphi consensus approach to elicit expert opinion from clinicians, healthcare and public health administrators, and health services researchers. Three rounds of online surveys were completed. To retain survey items, we <i>a priori</i> determined a threshold of 75% or greater endorsement for items rated "highly important to essential." A total of 47 international experts responded. Forty of 71 care delivery priorities were retained. These 40 priorities comprised 25 systems (8 related to infrastructure [e.g., systemic enhanced support from federal resources during a pandemic]; 8 to care delivery [e.g., policies in place and operational for rationing of care]; and 9 to training, infection control, and communication [e.g., training for healthcare workers on protocols and/or processes for rapid testing]), 11 related to supplies (e.g., safe handling of biomedical waste), and 4 related to staffing (e.g., programs and/or systems to support staff retention). By organizing these priorities on the basis of implementation complexity and applying relevant frameworks, the project offers strategies to inform investment and guide global healthcare systems in pandemic preparedness planning for the future.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202502-221st
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Priorities for Healthcare Systems Emergency Preparedness in Inpatient Settings Informed by COVID-19: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report

Jonna L. Morris, Michele Klein‐Fedyshin, Deena Kelly Costa, Meghan Brooks Lane-Fall et al.
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Disaster Response and Management
article

Priorities for Healthcare Systems Emergency Preparedness in Inpatient Settings Informed by COVID-19: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report

Jonna L. Morris, Michele Klein‐Fedyshin, Deena Kelly Costa, Meghan Brooks Lane-Fall, Jennifer B. Seaman, Daniel Brodie, Fang Han, Jakob I. McSparron, Lynn M. Baniak, Thomas Penzel, Jill Guttormson, M. Melanie Lyons
article en

Abstract

This workshop identified a set of core system-level care delivery priorities that emerged during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic to assist global healthcare systems to respond to future similar emergencies using an informed and systematic approach. Led by a working group (<i>n</i> = 14) of nurses and physicians with diverse clinical and administrative backgrounds, we conducted a literature review of staffing, supplies, and systems in hospital inpatient settings to inform potential candidate priorities of COVID-19 care delivery challenges. We then used a modified Delphi consensus approach to elicit expert opinion from clinicians, healthcare and public health administrators, and health services researchers. Three rounds of online surveys were completed. To retain survey items, we <i>a priori</i> determined a threshold of 75% or greater endorsement for items rated "highly important to essential." A total of 47 international experts responded. Forty of 71 care delivery priorities were retained. These 40 priorities comprised 25 systems (8 related to infrastructure [e.g., systemic enhanced support from federal resources during a pandemic]; 8 to care delivery [e.g., policies in place and operational for rationing of care]; and 9 to training, infection control, and communication [e.g., training for healthcare workers on protocols and/or processes for rapid testing]), 11 related to supplies (e.g., safe handling of biomedical waste), and 4 related to staffing (e.g., programs and/or systems to support staff retention). By organizing these priorities on the basis of implementation complexity and applying relevant frameworks, the project offers strategies to inform investment and guide global healthcare systems in pandemic preparedness planning for the future.

Annals of the American Thoracic SocietyVol. 22(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.