Impact of Method of Detection of Breast Cancer on Clinical Outcomes in Individuals Aged 40 Years or Older

Purpose To determine the impact of method of detection (MOD) on breast cancer stage, treatment, and breast cancer-related mortality in patients aged 40 years or older. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational cohort study included consecutive female individuals aged 40 years or older diagnosed with breast cancer at a tertiary referral center between January and December 2016. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were computed using logistic regression modeling to determine the impact of MOD (screen-detected vs symptom-detected) on pathologic stage (American Joint Commission on Cancer, eighth edition), surgical treatment, and chemotherapy, with Cox regression to find the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI for mortality. Significance level was set at a <i>P</i> value less than .013 using Bonferroni correction. For subgroup analyses, patients were divided into categorical age groups: 40 to 49 years, 50 to 59 years, 60 to 74 years, and 75 years or older. Results A total of 821 patients (mean age [±SD], 62.5 years ± 12.2) were included; mean duration of follow-up was 6.7 years. Symptom-detected cancers (50.1% [411 of 821]) were more frequent in less-screened age groups (72.9% [97 of 133] in women aged 40-49 years and 70.4% [95 of 135] in those aged ≥75 years) compared with screened age groups (49.5% [106 of 214] in those aged 50-59 years and 33.3% [113 of 339 in those aged 60-74 years]). The odds of advanced cancer (stage IIA or greater) were 6.60 higher (95% CI: 4.96, 8.77; <i>P</i> < .001) with symptom detection (32.5% [267 of 821]) compared with screen detection (10.2% [84 of 821]). Symptom-detected cancers had higher HR of breast cancer-related death (HR, 1.63 [95% CI: 1.17, 2.28]; <i>P</i> = .004), higher odds of mastectomy (OR, 2.20 [95% CI: 1.63, 2.96]; <i>P</i> < .001), and the same odds of chemotherapy, adjusted for age and stage at diagnosis. Multivariable analysis found that higher tumor stage was associated with symptom detection (OR, 6.40 [95% CI: 4.74, 8.70]; <i>P</i> < .001), greater risk of chemotherapy (OR, 1.97 [95% CI: 1.39, 2.78]; <i>P</i> < .001), and age at diagnosis (OR, 1.02 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.03]; <i>P</i> = .001). Conclusion Screen-detected breast cancer in patients aged 40 years or older was associated with lower odds of advanced cancer, mastectomy, and breast cancer-related death compared with symptom-detected cancer. <b>Keywords:</b> Breast Screening, Guidelines, Breast Cancer, Treatment <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Imaging Cancer
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240046
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Method of Detection of Breast Cancer on Clinical Outcomes in Individuals Aged 40 Years or Older

Betty Anne Schwarz, Yashmin Nisha, Jean M. Seely, Javeria Munir et al.
5 citations
Radiology Imaging Cancer
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
5.23
article

Impact of Method of Detection of Breast Cancer on Clinical Outcomes in Individuals Aged 40 Years or Older

Betty Anne Schwarz, Yashmin Nisha, Jean M. Seely, Javeria Munir, Mary Beth Bissell, Nayaar Islam, Erin Cordeiro
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Purpose To determine the impact of method of detection (MOD) on breast cancer stage, treatment, and breast cancer-related mortality in patients aged 40 years or older. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational cohort study included consecutive female individuals aged 40 years or older diagnosed with breast cancer at a tertiary referral center between January and December 2016. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were computed using logistic regression modeling to determine the impact of MOD (screen-detected vs symptom-detected) on pathologic stage (American Joint Commission on Cancer, eighth edition), surgical treatment, and chemotherapy, with Cox regression to find the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI for mortality. Significance level was set at a <i>P</i> value less than .013 using Bonferroni correction. For subgroup analyses, patients were divided into categorical age groups: 40 to 49 years, 50 to 59 years, 60 to 74 years, and 75 years or older. Results A total of 821 patients (mean age [±SD], 62.5 years ± 12.2) were included; mean duration of follow-up was 6.7 years. Symptom-detected cancers (50.1% [411 of 821]) were more frequent in less-screened age groups (72.9% [97 of 133] in women aged 40-49 years and 70.4% [95 of 135] in those aged ≥75 years) compared with screened age groups (49.5% [106 of 214] in those aged 50-59 years and 33.3% [113 of 339 in those aged 60-74 years]). The odds of advanced cancer (stage IIA or greater) were 6.60 higher (95% CI: 4.96, 8.77; <i>P</i> < .001) with symptom detection (32.5% [267 of 821]) compared with screen detection (10.2% [84 of 821]). Symptom-detected cancers had higher HR of breast cancer-related death (HR, 1.63 [95% CI: 1.17, 2.28]; <i>P</i> = .004), higher odds of mastectomy (OR, 2.20 [95% CI: 1.63, 2.96]; <i>P</i> < .001), and the same odds of chemotherapy, adjusted for age and stage at diagnosis. Multivariable analysis found that higher tumor stage was associated with symptom detection (OR, 6.40 [95% CI: 4.74, 8.70]; <i>P</i> < .001), greater risk of chemotherapy (OR, 1.97 [95% CI: 1.39, 2.78]; <i>P</i> < .001), and age at diagnosis (OR, 1.02 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.03]; <i>P</i> = .001). Conclusion Screen-detected breast cancer in patients aged 40 years or older was associated with lower odds of advanced cancer, mastectomy, and breast cancer-related death compared with symptom-detected cancer. <b>Keywords:</b> Breast Screening, Guidelines, Breast Cancer, Treatment <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.

Radiology Imaging CancerVol. 7(3)
University of Ottawa (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Health Sciences North (CA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
5.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.