Head-to-head comparison of culture-based and direct-from-specimen molecular testing for carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli: a year-long comparative study in a moderate-prevalence setting

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Objectives</h3> An efficient testing and isolation strategy is essential to contain the spread of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli (CPGNB). We compared the performance of a culture-based strategy utilising chromID CARBA SMART agar followed by confirmation with conventional PCR, against direct molecular testing with the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R assay, for the detection of CPGNB in rectal swab samples obtained from patients admitted to our hospital from 9 April 2019 to 15 March 2020. <h3>Methods</h3> Detection of CPGNB by either method constituted the reference standard. In addition to routine screening for <i>Enterobacterales</i>, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) isolated on culture were also identified and subjected to whole genome sequencing for the detection of carbapenemase genes. We also calculated the number of patient contacts averted or generated by each strategy, and the difference in laboratory personnel hands-on time between strategies. <h3>Results</h3> Of the 29,446 samples tested (from 17,097 unique patients), 693 (2.35%) were positive for CPGNB (for on-panel targets) by either testing strategy. Xpert Carba-R detected carbapenemase in 625/693 samples (sensitivity: 90.2%), compared with 301/693 samples (sensitivity: 46.3%) for the culture-based strategy if NFGNB were disregarded, and 449/693 samples (sensitivity: 64.8%) for the culture-based strategy if NFGNB were included, while requiring less hands-on time (average of 1.3 minutes versus 89.97 minutes). Xpert Carba-R averted 6,983 potential contacts (for test-concordant specimens) and 21,780 potential contacts (for test-discordant specimens) in total. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Direct molecular testing with Xpert Carba-R outperformed the culture-based strategy for detection of CPGNB, demonstrating superior sensitivity and reduced hands-on time. It also routinely detected carbapenemases in NFGNB; these should be included in hospital surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CMI Communications
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmicom.2025.105099
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Head-to-head comparison of culture-based and direct-from-specimen molecular testing for carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli: a year-long comparative study in a moderate-prevalence setting

Chin‐Chen Chu, Prakki Sai Rama Sridatta, Angela Yun June Tan, Bee Fong Poh et al.
CMI Communications
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

Head-to-head comparison of culture-based and direct-from-specimen molecular testing for carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli: a year-long comparative study in a moderate-prevalence setting

Chin‐Chen Chu, Prakki Sai Rama Sridatta, Angela Yun June Tan, Bee Fong Poh, Shawn Vasoo, Wai Yie Leong, Janis Wanning Loh, Bo Yan Khoo, Oon Tek Ng, Jia Qi Kum, Yan Ping Sun, Hwee Pin Phua, Weixiang Lian, Brenda Ang, Angela Chow, Ze Qin Lim, Kalisvar Marimuthu, Pei Yun Hon, Duan S. Loy, Partha Pratim De
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Objectives</h3> An efficient testing and isolation strategy is essential to contain the spread of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli (CPGNB). We compared the performance of a culture-based strategy utilising chromID CARBA SMART agar followed by confirmation with conventional PCR, against direct molecular testing with the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R assay, for the detection of CPGNB in rectal swab samples obtained from patients admitted to our hospital from 9 April 2019 to 15 March 2020. <h3>Methods</h3> Detection of CPGNB by either method constituted the reference standard. In addition to routine screening for <i>Enterobacterales</i>, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) isolated on culture were also identified and subjected to whole genome sequencing for the detection of carbapenemase genes. We also calculated the number of patient contacts averted or generated by each strategy, and the difference in laboratory personnel hands-on time between strategies. <h3>Results</h3> Of the 29,446 samples tested (from 17,097 unique patients), 693 (2.35%) were positive for CPGNB (for on-panel targets) by either testing strategy. Xpert Carba-R detected carbapenemase in 625/693 samples (sensitivity: 90.2%), compared with 301/693 samples (sensitivity: 46.3%) for the culture-based strategy if NFGNB were disregarded, and 449/693 samples (sensitivity: 64.8%) for the culture-based strategy if NFGNB were included, while requiring less hands-on time (average of 1.3 minutes versus 89.97 minutes). Xpert Carba-R averted 6,983 potential contacts (for test-concordant specimens) and 21,780 potential contacts (for test-discordant specimens) in total. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Direct molecular testing with Xpert Carba-R outperformed the culture-based strategy for detection of CPGNB, demonstrating superior sensitivity and reduced hands-on time. It also routinely detected carbapenemases in NFGNB; these should be included in hospital surveillance.

CMI CommunicationsVol. 2(3)
National University of Singapore (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Tan Tock Seng Hospital (SG), National University Health System (SG), National Centre for Infectious Diseases (SG)
Ministry of Health -Singapore, Medical Research Council, National Medical Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.