Stigmatising poverty: understanding the treatment of poor and destitute bodies in British cities (1800–60)

This article revisits how the poor and destitute were treated in the waning years of the churchyard-based burial system. Working-class families increasingly risked funeral destitution as changing norms increased the expected cost of burial and mourning. A death in the family meant lost revenue and possibly debt. New goalposts for respectability and 1830s utilitarian reforms worsened the outlook for the dead poor, exposing their corpses to physical destruction through dissection – once the punishment of executed murderers. Poor families often preferred pauper burials, paid for by parishes and Poor Law unions at the cost of most funerary furnishings, the choice of resting-place and, on occasion, even the basic dignity of individual funerals, creating symbolic violence. Paternalistic ideals expressed by key institutional actors often concealed economic self-interest, while the working-class’s infantilisation undermined their identity. Lastly, lack of parliamentary will to endorse radical reform compromised Britain’s funeral transition, leading to an extraordinarily heterogeneous burial system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Remains and Violence An Interdisciplinary Journal
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7227/hrv.11.1.1
Primary Topic
Historical Economic and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stigmatising poverty: understanding the treatment of poor and destitute bodies in British cities (1800–60)

Tristan Portier
Human Remains and Violence An Interdisciplinary Journal
Historical Economic and Social Studies
article

Stigmatising poverty: understanding the treatment of poor and destitute bodies in British cities (1800–60)

Tristan Portier
article en

Abstract

This article revisits how the poor and destitute were treated in the waning years of the churchyard-based burial system. Working-class families increasingly risked funeral destitution as changing norms increased the expected cost of burial and mourning. A death in the family meant lost revenue and possibly debt. New goalposts for respectability and 1830s utilitarian reforms worsened the outlook for the dead poor, exposing their corpses to physical destruction through dissection – once the punishment of executed murderers. Poor families often preferred pauper burials, paid for by parishes and Poor Law unions at the cost of most funerary furnishings, the choice of resting-place and, on occasion, even the basic dignity of individual funerals, creating symbolic violence. Paternalistic ideals expressed by key institutional actors often concealed economic self-interest, while the working-class’s infantilisation undermined their identity. Lastly, lack of parliamentary will to endorse radical reform compromised Britain’s funeral transition, leading to an extraordinarily heterogeneous burial system.

Human Remains and Violence An Interdisciplinary JournalVol. 11(1)
Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Historical Economic and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.