Assessing Compliance with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in Rwanda and Malawi: A Mixed-Methods Study of Systemic and Behavioural Barriers

Introduction: The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) is a low-cost, high-impact tool shown to improve surgical outcomes and enhance safety culture, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite its effectiveness, adherence remains inconsistent across resource-constrained settings. This study evaluated WHO SSC availability and compliance in Rwandan and Malawian hospitals, identifying systemic and behavioural factors influencing implementation. Methods: A prospective observational study and cross-sectional staff survey were conducted in 28 referral and district hospitals in Rwanda and Malawi. Surgical cases were selected using stratified random sampling, and checklist adherence was assessed via structured observation across the three checklist phases. Theatre staff completed questionnaires on checklist familiarity, training, and team dynamics. Statistical analysis included descriptive methods and generalised linear models to identify predictors of checklist availability and use. Results: Of 602 surgical procedures observed, checklist availability was significantly higher in referral hospitals (62%) than in district hospitals (30%), and in elective (56%) versus emergency surgeries (38%). Availability was lower in Rwanda (31%) compared to Malawi (69%) (p < 0.01), yet Rwandan hospitals demonstrated superior adherence across all phases: Sign-In (estimate = 29.4, p < 0.01), Time-Out (15.8, p < 0.01), and Sign-Out (15.2, p < 0.01). Team presence during Time-Out increased checklist use eleven-fold (OR: 11.8, 95% CI: 6.56–21.33). Familiarity with the checklist and 5–10 years of experience also improved compliance. Discussion: Despite broad awareness, checklist use in LMICs remains inconsistent due to logistical barriers and workforce dynamics. Targeted training, increased checklist availability, and digital tools may strengthen implementation and enhance surgical safety in under-resourced settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Impact Surgery
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62463/surgery.158
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Compliance with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in Rwanda and Malawi: A Mixed-Methods Study of Systemic and Behavioural Barriers

JC Allen Ingabire, Georges Bucyibaruta, Vanessa Msosa, Faustin Ntirenganya et al.
Impact Surgery
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Assessing Compliance with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in Rwanda and Malawi: A Mixed-Methods Study of Systemic and Behavioural Barriers

JC Allen Ingabire, Georges Bucyibaruta, Vanessa Msosa, Faustin Ntirenganya, Alphonsine Imanishimwe, Emmanuel Munyaneza, Isaie Ncogoza, Rashid Ngalawango, Zaithwa Matemvu
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) is a low-cost, high-impact tool shown to improve surgical outcomes and enhance safety culture, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite its effectiveness, adherence remains inconsistent across resource-constrained settings. This study evaluated WHO SSC availability and compliance in Rwandan and Malawian hospitals, identifying systemic and behavioural factors influencing implementation. Methods: A prospective observational study and cross-sectional staff survey were conducted in 28 referral and district hospitals in Rwanda and Malawi. Surgical cases were selected using stratified random sampling, and checklist adherence was assessed via structured observation across the three checklist phases. Theatre staff completed questionnaires on checklist familiarity, training, and team dynamics. Statistical analysis included descriptive methods and generalised linear models to identify predictors of checklist availability and use. Results: Of 602 surgical procedures observed, checklist availability was significantly higher in referral hospitals (62%) than in district hospitals (30%), and in elective (56%) versus emergency surgeries (38%). Availability was lower in Rwanda (31%) compared to Malawi (69%) (p < 0.01), yet Rwandan hospitals demonstrated superior adherence across all phases: Sign-In (estimate = 29.4, p < 0.01), Time-Out (15.8, p < 0.01), and Sign-Out (15.2, p < 0.01). Team presence during Time-Out increased checklist use eleven-fold (OR: 11.8, 95% CI: 6.56–21.33). Familiarity with the checklist and 5–10 years of experience also improved compliance. Discussion: Despite broad awareness, checklist use in LMICs remains inconsistent due to logistical barriers and workforce dynamics. Targeted training, increased checklist availability, and digital tools may strengthen implementation and enhance surgical safety in under-resourced settings.

Impact SurgeryVol. 2(4)
Kamuzu Central Hospital (MW), University of Kigali (RW), University of Rwanda (RW), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (RW), University of Global Health Equity (RW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.